fnaf 4 theory In the FNaF4 minigame, why would the tiny toy chica be missing her beak?

[skrauss123]

What if the answer is because the crying child saw normal sized Toy Chica without her beak? Now hear me out for a minute. The year fnaf 4 (or at least its minigames) takes place in, seems to have been up for debate for quite a while now. This is my theory on the matter. Certain things within the fnaf 4 minigames seem to contradict the year in with they take place, such as mangle and the toys, the television, the restaurant itself and even the teaser source code. I think I have an explanation. Now the minigames seem not to take place after you complete each night. Rather they are apparently memories leading up to the crying child's accident. So here's where it gets interesting. Could it be that the crying child survived the incident and went on to visit all the other restaurants? Perhaps he was one of the nightguards. Think about it. As well as Tiny Toy Chica's beak there's also phone guy's recording that can be heard being played backwards, and a picture resembling the good ending from fnaf 3 on the left wall in the main part of the game. As Scott said, no Easter egg is meaningless and as the child would have no doubt suffered some form of brain damage. I believe that his memories from the other resturants got mixed in with his memories of that time. That would explain every seemingly contradictory thing within the minigames. Keep in mind we don't know how much time has passed between when Fredbears bite happened and the crying child's apparent death in the final minigame. Even more than thirty years could have went by. Could the crying child have really been killed by the fire at the end of fnaf 3? Could he have been reliving those memories on his last days? Alternatively, he could be haunting one of the animitronics, maybe the sl animitronic in the current teaser, perhaps the puppet. Maybe a multitude of them-- one who's at least been in all the resturants we know, who knows maybe both scenarios are correct. As far as I know, nobody else has suggested this. What do you think? I also have Theories of the Bite of 87 and the Secret in the Box that I will post later. (PS: I think it takes place in 1982 because while the child's memory may be inaccurate the teaser has no reason to lie and I think both as I remember living spirits being talked about in the novel also it gives new meaning to I will put you back together.)

[TheWolfman]

How would there even be toy animatronics... We see them all (toy freddy,bonnie,chica,foxy) and we get puppet and BB In halloween update

[jupiter]

Please... Add... Paragraphs...

Anyways, like eMSACHICK said, how could there even be Toy Animatronics?

[TheWolfman]

Yea... Though all we see are in the house of the child...

Some claim the child is Sammy... Proof is why his brother has a pink room with flowers all over it... It looks to... Girly. This would explain the young girl we see being Charlie and not laughing at The child...

It would explain the figures being the toys and why they have all these parts in the house (mangle toy) and why the kid has nightmares of the animatronics and the kid getting killed: scott did say some of the book connects to the lore...

And sorry Dewey I can't do paragraphs

[Metbert]

I think that the toys of the kid were only plastic action figures of the normal characters ; BB and Funtime Foxy were two different character( probably secondary characters of "Fredbear and Friends ") .

anyway this your theory is very interesting .

[skrauss123]

just too clear up some confusion when I say toys I mean the toys the girl in the night 3 minigames has

[Cael M]

I think the toys may have been the inspiration for the creation of Toy animatronics

[skrauss123]

Originally posted by Cael M:

I think the toys may have been the inspiration for the creation of Toy animatronics

thats an interesting theory but it dosen't touch the subject of why tiny toy chica's beak is missing