Installa Steam
Accedi
|
Lingua
简体中文 (cinese semplificato)
繁體中文 (cinese tradizionale)
日本語 (giapponese)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandese)
Български (bulgaro)
Čeština (ceco)
Dansk (danese)
Deutsch (tedesco)
English (inglese)
Español - España (spagnolo - Spagna)
Español - Latinoamérica (spagnolo dell'America Latina)
Ελληνικά (greco)
Français (francese)
Indonesiano
Magyar (ungherese)
Nederlands (olandese)
Norsk (norvegese)
Polski (polacco)
Português (portoghese - Portogallo)
Português - Brasil (portoghese brasiliano)
Română (rumeno)
Русский (russo)
Suomi (finlandese)
Svenska (svedese)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraino)
Segnala un problema nella traduzione
Keep in mind that this is a VERY incompetent corporation who's known for making stupid decisions.
Or, Y'know, the springlocks could be VERY strong, hence they crush someone.
Also, in regards to there being "sharp" mechanisms within the springlock suits:
-machinery doesn't have to be necessarily sharp to kill someone. With enough force, simply getting crushed by gears and sprockets is enough to viably end a man's life.
-the novel has already explained how exactly a springlock suit kills a person [SPOILERS AHEAD]:
Once the springlocks break, two instances will occur. First, the springlocks will cut into every part of your body, including your organs, causing serious bleeding. Second, the mechanisms will attempt to move back into place, slowly crushing you to death. you will be completely aware of it for every second, knowing that you're dying and in absolute agony.
^Now before you say that the novel is an invalid source for info since Scott has clearly stated that it was not meant to solve the lore, I would like to point out that I'm not using this to solve the lore. I am simply explaining and clearing up how the mechanics of the suit works, which is perfectly fine since the novel is technically canon, but I'm not solving anything lore-wise.
Nice try, but I'm afraid that the springlocks are still capable of killing a man.
If they springs were very strong, wouldn't they be a lot thicker? Making even less room?
Reasons I can't explain
Okay then...
"All" we know about the Springlock suits are
1)Big enough so a human can fit inside
2)The amount of force the springs have
3) Why are the locks so easily to be loose?
4) Wouldn't the company just get rid of the whole suit idea and just keep them as animatronics?
Just make a fricking chuck e cheese suit of them I don't care
2) Doesn't this also go against you?
3) I have no idea what you're trying to say here. Though if this is supposed to be a fact, why did you make it a question?
4) Innovation is everything. The concept of a suit/animatronic hybrid is very unique, thus the inclusion of them in Fredbear's and Freddy's. It wasn't until the "multiple and simultaneous springlock failures" where they were forced to decommission them.
I'm a bit confused by this post. Please explain a bit more.
Time to start animating...