How's the performance?

[Dubious Muldoon]

I played this game when it first came out and it ran terribly on my system (GTX 760, Intel 3.0 processor) Has the performace in any way imporved?

[swenor]

Dude. Intel 3.0 means NOTHING. Maybe you are running some weak Celeron and maybe you are running some LGA 2011-3. Come on ffs.

[hyperion]

Originally posted by The Boulevard:

I played this game when it first came out and it ran terribly on my system (GTX 760, Intel 3.0 processor) Has the performace in any way imporved?

The stuttering and most of the bugs seem to be gone. Game seems much more polished than before, including voice acting. But for me, the performance (I'm talking framerate) is worse than before, and the graphic quality is not nearly as nice as before during regular gameplay. I'm very diappointed so far.

[SpinDie426]

i refunded game but with i7 3770k, R9 290X, 16gb ram, and 500gb ssd i only got 28fps in cities

[Raidor [dph]]

@Hyperion: you say "graphic quality is not nearly as nice as before during regular gameplay" - we did not reduce any graphic details. Did you change your monitor or anything on the settings?

[Dubious Muldoon]

Originally posted by swenor:

Dude. Intel 3.0 means NOTHING. Maybe you are running some weak Celeron and maybe you are running some LGA 2011-3. Come on ffs.

sorry, should have specified. Intel i5-4430 3.00ghz cpu, winodws 10 64 bit, nvidia gtx 760.

[Dubious Muldoon]

Originally posted by SpinDie426:

i refunded game but with i7 3770k, R9 290X, 16gb ram, and 500gb ssd i only got 28fps in cities

Wow, with a rig like yours, thats really bad. I might hold off on this one.

[jaaay85]

I have a Core i7 920 (2.67ghz), 9GB RAM, Geforce GTX 780 and it runs perfectly fine. Benchmarked at a solid 30 fps, no less than that.

[Raidor [dph]]

I also see no technical reason, why it should run so slow on this config.

[Dubious Muldoon]

Originally posted by netnerd85:

I have a Core i7 920 (2.67ghz), 9GB RAM, Geforce GTX 780 and it runs perfectly fine. Benchmarked at a solid 30 fps, no less than that.

Does this game have a benchmark tool?

[jaaay85]

In the settings menu

[Dubious Muldoon]

Thanks, might check it out now.

[Damian Ramirez]

seems like the game run like crap with powerful graphic cards ( like nvidia 980) and perfect in old graphic cards (like nvidia 400-500 series)

[hyperion]

Originally posted by Raidor dph:

@Hyperion: you say "graphic quality is not nearly as nice as before during regular gameplay" - we did not reduce any graphic details. Did you change your monitor or anything on the settings?

Raidor, No, same monitor. But I was too quick to say that, it's probably not true, it's just that I had been messing with the settings to see if I could get better FPS. When I set everything back to max, it looks the same as before. The cut scenes actually look more crisp, but I get a solid 144FPS during cut scenes. I still cannot get over 40-50 FPS at 1080 with GTX970 SLI, during actual game play. That is what I'm disappointed with. Is SLI actually supposed to working in the game? Because it's definitely not working for me.

I apologize for the statement about the graphics, I shouldn't have said that.

[hyperion]

Originally posted by netnerd85:

I have a Core i7 920 (2.67ghz), 9GB RAM, Geforce GTX 780 and it runs perfectly fine. Benchmarked at a solid 30 fps, no less than that.

30FPS is terrible. You need more RAM, but with that GPU, 30FPS is bad. That's for console games, not gaming PCs.

[Damian Ramirez]

Originally posted by hyperion:

Originally posted by netnerd85:

I have a Core i7 920 (2.67ghz), 9GB RAM, Geforce GTX 780 and it runs perfectly fine. Benchmarked at a solid 30 fps, no less than that.

30FPS is terrible. You need more RAM, but with that GPU, 30FPS is bad. That's for console games, not gaming PCs.

the game runs the same as two worlds 2 with old video cards,but with the 700-800-900 cards runs bad as hell.i saw a video of a guy running the game in 4k 70 fps with a nvidia 460....