Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Eh, if you think about it more than Rowling did, then he is basically a high-tier slasher villain: he (literally) magically knows when and where someone is talking about him, he can not be beaten in a straight fight and can only be held off or escaped from (unless you're the hero with plot armor), he resurrects if somehow killed by a legendary character, he can teleport via multiple methods, he's pale but somehow blends into the shadows, and he has a wide variety of brutal killing methods (instakill spell, siccing his venomous and constricting snake on someone, a spell that tortures you until you are permanently crippled and insane, a spell that re-opens every wound you ever had if Snape told him about it, a spell that blasts a hole through any matter including a living body, his own clawed hands if his wand is out of reach, etc.).
All that aside, Rowling would probably never sign off for any of her properties appearing in DBD: she can demand basically any price she wants even through her controversy, and she's so vehemently anti-LGBT+ that a single mention of any of the pride charms would cause her to denounce the game.
All I read was "Ganondorf for DBD confirmed".