Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Discussions Rules and Guidelines
Report this post
There is already nudity in the game. Kids shouldn't be playing anyways. It is no different then rating a movie as R that contains nudity, then the parent renting the movie and letting their kids watch. The parents are already consenting to their kids seeing nudity.
There is already boobs in the game. The Hag's boobs are already in the game. What is the difference if they look like 100 year old boobs to 20 something boobs?
Not bait. Serious question for the Devs. If there is to be true equality then everything should be treated equal.
This outfit make david David. This guy taht isn't afraid to get on a fight that he can't win in the first place
All the female caracter in this game would much prefer having shirt than be topless
(+ you can't says sex doesn't exist beacuse you want it, your idea doesn't fit the game)
Not sure what you meant by the last line.. I'm not talking about sex other then a character's "sex", male or female.
Why not create a new survivor who might be an adult entertainer?... They may want to go topless. Future thought.
Cause you don't believe in equality? If you don't believe in 1 = 1 then I can't help you.
If you consider a shirtless David normal, then it would make sense to think a shirtless Kate, or Meg would be normal. If you still place stereotypes of "old' social norms on day-to-day "things" but don't consider what would be "equal" then you are sitting behind some mask only pretending you know what should be "right". You are told that woman shirtless is considers a taboo, but not a shirtless man. You are whipped.
If a man can be topless, then so can a woman. If you can't understand that then you'll always be thinking, man vs woman.
That is the whole point though. It is a game so if people take it too serious then WTF.
They wanted this to be like an old horror movie. That is why we see our favourite old horror villians like Freddy, Michael and Leatherface. Jason would be here if they had the chance.
I believe all those movies had nudity in them, so they shouldn't be afraid to add in some more. I remember seeing allot of old horror movies with the odd scene of the topless couple.. with them falling victim to the killer
It could be an expensive cosmetic. Also if they really wanted, they could have a "adult" filter on it. Even though this game is already rated 18+.
They are making the skin 10+ bucks per outfit... imagine what they could get for some topless cosmetics. I bet David topless if their best seller so far. I wonder why? But yet people shouldn't see a topless woman survivor character as something "wrong".
Jesus the amount of ironie into that sentence is gorgeous. If you already know why thant is a bad idea. They want to sell thing that are cool or fit the character, not the player.
topless woman are seen in horror movie yes, but telling '' i want a topless woman in the game beacuse the boys does '' its is the worst argument you can come up whit.
This horror game will loose all credibility if they had '' sexy outfit ''. Beacuse saying horror movie does it yeah but does dead by daylight its a horror game ? Yes ok let use opinion here does dead by daylight scare you ? No
That why ace or nea got fancy outfit for. So saying beacuse horror movie do it then the game should do it its stupid
Than again, why would the devs give a topless oufit ? for money ? what their going to do ? make them bounce around ?
You can't change the truth, were human and seeing those thing its exciting. You can't says it isn't. And as sad at it is the society of today see this as sexy. That why your never going to see ♥♥♥♥ or breast into that games for no reason
(unless they had some kind of thing were when the killer hit the survivors the clothe rip off and that is just basic logic Thats a good reason.)
If a killer is obsess whit sex and just cut off private parts, than its would be tolerate. But you need a reason and not just saying '' beacuse why not ''.
Not gonna quote all that.. My response is...
WHY NOT.
If you are gonna have a shirtless David, then lets have a shirtless.. Kate.. Meg... Or Claudette...
Cause they can do it. Even though this game is already an 18+ rated game, the Devs can add a filter in the game, those that might find it offensive can see some other skin as a placeholder.
They could make more money... You bet. And why not. Those that don't mind the nudity can opt in, those that don't can opt out. It wouldn't change the game mechanics in anyway.
So why not. If some people can enjoy playing a shirtless David, why can't others enjoy a shirtless Kate. And it isn't just "boys" that would enjoy it, so don't assume. I would imagine their are some gay men that enjoy having a shirtless David as their character.
I should be able to opt out of that nudity if I don't wish to see David's nipples in my face as he heals me. I should also be able to opt in to see a shirtless Meg's nipples in my face as she heals me.
TIT for tat.