Steam 설치
로그인
|
언어
简体中文(중국어 간체)
繁體中文(중국어 번체)
日本語(일본어)
ไทย(태국어)
Български(불가리아어)
Čeština(체코어)
Dansk(덴마크어)
Deutsch(독일어)
English(영어)
Español - España(스페인어 - 스페인)
Español - Latinoamérica(스페인어 - 중남미)
Ελληνικά(그리스어)
Français(프랑스어)
Italiano(이탈리아어)
Bahasa Indonesia(인도네시아어)
Magyar(헝가리어)
Nederlands(네덜란드어)
Norsk(노르웨이어)
Polski(폴란드어)
Português(포르투갈어 - 포르투갈)
Português - Brasil(포르투갈어 - 브라질)
Română(루마니아어)
Русский(러시아어)
Suomi(핀란드어)
Svenska(스웨덴어)
Türkçe(튀르키예어)
Tiếng Việt(베트남어)
Українська(우크라이나어)
번역 관련 문제 보고
Alright now let's have fun :
1 - Pennywise doesn't fit the lore
2 - Not adequate in any way to DBD's universe
3 - Strong lack of originality
4 - Make some non licensed killers
5 - ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ CLOWNS !!!!
there. I hate clowns. No clowns for dbd, thank you, stop with the hype, thank you.
Pennywise is not a human in the first place, he's some kind of ... weird illusion, all of DBD's killers are/were humans before the Entity corrupted them. So Pennywise is not fit for DBD's lore, argument valid.
Strong lack of originality, I could change my mind on that if someone actually came up with an incredible ability concept, but just folllowing the hype like a good sheep is absolutely nothing original, to support this argument; Pennywise has been suggested more than 20 times on this very forum.
And about me being biased for clown killers; well; i've got my personal opinions too, doesn't mean my arguments are invalid, as proven just above. And the Wraith in his very lore, in the fact that he's merely an non-licensed killer makes him more original than Pennywise, alongside the Nurse, the Trapper, the HB ( cuz he was inspired from LF, not LF itself ), the Huntress, etc ...
Now, i'm not really sorry to say that, but there won't be a Pennywise. Not saying that there won't ever be a clown killer ( although I really hope not ) but if there is, it's gonna be Jester style. Not fully clown.
And your biased against Clowns doesn't change the fact that a Pennywise Killer being introduced now would be an excellent move and excellent timing.
And you're very very wrong about the story behind him. They'd make it up ? Then it wouldn't be Pennywise, it would just be a clown killer, I mean, you can't change a movie's story and just say "yeah that's one guy from this, but he's got a different" story. But if you're thinking that it would make it original, then you're agreeing with me than a non-licensed killer would be more original than just a licensed.
And, info : I haven't played in like 3-4 weeks, the only thing keeping me 'round here is just cause I'm fond of DBD's lore. And there are many, many other people that also play cause they enjoy the lore, the ambiance.
When one stumbles upon a growing fire, one does not pour gasoline on it. But this was an action taken by officials that had no idea how it would shape this demon in the boy’s body. Sending Michael to a mental institution was a feeble attempt to save the child. Unsuccessful therapy and nightly screams just made him even more introverted and deranged. People hoped that Michael Myers would end up a parenthesis, soon to be forgotten and buried, a failure that soon were to rot away. But then...he escaped. < Michael Myres lore in Dead by Daylight, describes his actual lore and then at the end leaves it open to speculation and that the entity somehow got him. They could easily do a similar thing with Pennywise. And the idea of the game having "boundaries" and realistic killers is quite a stupid thing to say when there is a formless, multi-dimensional, infinitely powerful entity using killers to do it's bidding. So the concept of something alien like has already been introduced. So no, I don't think Pennywise is out of the question at all.
Thing is : Myers is real, Pennywise isn't, the Entity can only corrupt humans, it is not some kind of joker to insert absolutely any killer they want. If they changed Myers's lore, they did it in a way so they wouldn't damage DBD's universe. But Pennywise isn't human in the first place and he's off-topic, which is why developping Pennywise would be like a slap accross the lore's face.
And Second of all, I don't make the rules, if you wanna complain on how rigid the story is, don't do it with me, do it with the devs, that's their game and they make the rules, gameplay or lore, it's all up to them. And i'll agree with them when they'll say in some eventual DBD dev stream that they cannot add Pennywise due to not breaking the game atmosphere.
And if you think that people have been hardened by the game being different, then more than anything, the devs won't want to make a game breaking change, and I know for a fact ( previous discussions ) that many people won't be happy with a clown killer.
And when you argue, please focus on the elements you argue over, not the person you're talking to, it's very rude and most of the time, absolutely untrue.
An ideal killer shouldn't have its originality rely on its very lore, but on its gameplay and what it brings to the game. I'm not saying that the lore is pointless, of course not, but in-game, i'll give you that, people are more focused on gameplay than lore.
There's no ideal killer, you'll always have complaints and good feedback on killers, people's opinions are way too different, as proven above.
Now if you want me to tell you what killer would please, i'd send you back to a DLC project i made recently, but I don't know if you'll be able to have an objective point of view on it, since you and I have been pretty much in conflict the moment this topic started. Else :
http://steamcommunity.com/app/381210/discussions/5/2765630416821678196/
Now i'll accept any constructive comments on how I can improve this project, so if you've got any ideas to improve this, please enjoy yourself.