So. How are we feeling about Tokyo ghoul chapter?

[Igris]

I don't mind it, naturally it looks weird seeing anime character outside of anime, but I'll get used it over time.

[Crowbaria]

LegionXNX a écrit :

Crowbaria a écrit :

dude, we have a kpop killer.

Igris a écrit :

Tbf, we do have kpop killer who also doesn't belong to the game.

Yea and the killer is out of place too but at least in that kpop killers defense he is not an anime character and is his own creation.

And how can you be out of place in this game?

mr Kpoop fitting better because he’s an original creation holds no weight when the game's whole ahh identity is defined by mixing IPs and original characters [2nd new killer ever was literally Myers]. complaining about something being "out of place" in is like complaining that pineapple doesn’t belong on a pizza that already has anchovies, pepperoni, and grapes. And don't even get me started on nic cage lmao.

If you think they don't belong that's fine. But saying it objectively is objectively wrong.

[erandomone]

Making another character that dishes out deep wounds seems to be just asking for people to keep complain about him until he gets the skull merchant treatment.

Also, isn't he more of a protagonist? He's a bit of a dark one, but he's more of the hero type than somebody who'd fit the Slasher role, imo

[Simalf]

He seems like a worse version of Legion.

His leap can not put a survivor into the dying state.

[LegionXNX]

erandomone a écrit :

Making another character that dishes out deep wounds seems to be just asking for people to keep complain about him until he gets the skull merchant treatment.

Also, isn't he more of a protagonist? He's a bit of a dark one, but he's more of the hero type than somebody who'd fit the Slasher role, imo

I'm on a DBD stream and apparently for the lore behind this guy the entity apparently picked him up before his "hero phase" so this is an alt version of him like a "what if"

[Millo]

DBD as allways been about great name of horror. Tokyo ghoul never was that. "But there's one scary panel, there's gore and somtime it has a bit of horror" yeah but it just was a popular manga when we were adolescent. It's not Friday the 13h, it's not Silent Hill nor Resident Evil, It's not Hellraiser nor Texas Chainsaw Massacre. These are classic, tokyo ghoul is not, it didnt have the impact all the other licensed had at theyr prime time.

The problem come maybe that the horror theme of dbd is very american. Horror do not have the same code in every contry. And Japanese horror is generaly not about slahing killer. The most popular horror stuff in japan when it come to manga that are well writen and/or drawn are not compatible with dbd, with the exeption that validate the rule being Sadako.

You want to ad japanese horror, cool, but maybe it was not where you should look for horror sticking to this game.

[Simalf]

Seriously, why the heck do you guys care if the killer is form a horror game/movie/whatever?

If the character is able to be a murderous killer than thats enough of a criteria

[Erook D Weeb]

Didn't he come out just hours ago?
Decide in a week lol

[Stryder]

I feel Kaneki really doesn't fit as a killer, but more of a survivor. If Rize was the killer, then yes I would be all for this chapter. I get the feeling BHVR would use the opportunity to make Rize a skin and charge a ridiculous price for it like in the Castlevania Chapters.
Tokyo Ghoul was popular in the early 2010s so it's kind of late. The 2 seasons were good, however in the 3rd Season is so garbage and confusing I stopped watching it. Now if they had made a StarDust Crusaders chapter and put DIO as the killer, then this dbd update would have been a huge hit.

[LegionXNX]

Crowbaria a écrit :

LegionXNX a écrit :

Yea and the killer is out of place too but at least in that kpop killers defense he is not an anime character and is his own creation.

And how can you be out of place in this game?

mr Kpoop fitting better because he’s an original creation holds no weight when the game's whole ahh identity is defined by mixing IPs and original characters [2nd new killer ever was literally Myers]. complaining about something being "out of place" in is like complaining that pineapple doesn’t belong on a pizza that already has anchovies, pepperoni, and grapes. And don't even get me started on nic cage lmao.

If you think they don't belong that's fine. But saying it objectively is objectively wrong.

With that argument we can grab someone like shrek, give him red eyes and an axe and be like "well hes good cause its a killer".

[Crowbaria]

Millo a écrit :

DBD as allways been about great name of horror. Tokyo ghoul never was that. "But there's one scary panel, there's gore and somtime it has a bit of horror" yeah but it just was a popular manga when we were adolescent. It's not Friday the 13h, it's not Silent Hill nor Resident Evil, It's not Hellraiser nor Texas Chainsaw Massacre. These are classic, tokyo ghoul is not, it didnt have the impact all the other licensed had at theyr prime time.

The problem come maybe that the horror theme of dbd is very american. Horror do not have the same code in every contry. And Japanese horror is generaly not about slahing killer. The most popular horror stuff in japan when it come to manga that are well writen and/or drawn are not compatible with dbd, with the exeption that validate the rule being Sadako.

You want to ad japanese horror, cool, but maybe it was not where you should look for horror sticking to this game.

Ah yes, the greats of horror.
Vecna from DND
Literal kpop killer
Dracula from Castlevania.
Nemesis and Wesker from Resident Evil
Demogorgon from Stranger Things.

[Simalf]

Crowbaria a écrit :

Millo a écrit :

DBD as allways been about great name of horror. Tokyo ghoul never was that. "But there's one scary panel, there's gore and somtime it has a bit of horror" yeah but it just was a popular manga when we were adolescent. It's not Friday the 13h, it's not Silent Hill nor Resident Evil, It's not Hellraiser nor Texas Chainsaw Massacre. These are classic, tokyo ghoul is not, it didnt have the impact all the other licensed had at theyr prime time.

The problem come maybe that the horror theme of dbd is very american. Horror do not have the same code in every contry. And Japanese horror is generaly not about slahing killer. The most popular horror stuff in japan when it come to manga that are well writen and/or drawn are not compatible with dbd, with the exeption that validate the rule being Sadako.

You want to ad japanese horror, cool, but maybe it was not where you should look for horror sticking to this game.

Ah yes, the greats of horror.
Vecna from DND
Literal kpop killer
Dracula from Castlevania.
Nemesis and Wesker from Resident Evil
Demogorgon from Stranger Things.

like i said, saying "but __ isnt a horror media!" is just plain a silly argument.

So what?? if the character is a murderous killer then thats enough of a criteria.

[Crowbaria]

LegionXNX a écrit :

Crowbaria a écrit :

And how can you be out of place in this game?

mr Kpoop fitting better because he’s an original creation holds no weight when the game's whole ahh identity is defined by mixing IPs and original characters [2nd new killer ever was literally Myers]. complaining about something being "out of place" in is like complaining that pineapple doesn’t belong on a pizza that already has anchovies, pepperoni, and grapes. And don't even get me started on nic cage lmao.

If you think they don't belong that's fine. But saying it objectively is objectively wrong.

With that argument we can grab someone like shrek, give him red eyes and an axe and be like "well hes good cause its a killer".

The point isn’t “anything goes,” it’s that DBD’s creative freedom allows for almost any concept as long as it’s adapted to fit the game’s horror tone.

Shrek with red eyes and an axe? only thing scary about that would be if it was the shrek from shrek 5 lmao.
a twisted, decaying ogre who stalks his swamp with a rusted cleaver, covered in layers of mud and moss? that'd fit

[Vampirish Dracula]

His power is almost the same as Wesker. Am I missing something? Unfortunately, I was more excited even for the houndmaster than him.

[LegionXNX]

Crowbaria a écrit :

Millo a écrit :

DBD as allways been about great name of horror. Tokyo ghoul never was that. "But there's one scary panel, there's gore and somtime it has a bit of horror" yeah but it just was a popular manga when we were adolescent. It's not Friday the 13h, it's not Silent Hill nor Resident Evil, It's not Hellraiser nor Texas Chainsaw Massacre. These are classic, tokyo ghoul is not, it didnt have the impact all the other licensed had at theyr prime time.

The problem come maybe that the horror theme of dbd is very american. Horror do not have the same code in every contry. And Japanese horror is generaly not about slahing killer. The most popular horror stuff in japan when it come to manga that are well writen and/or drawn are not compatible with dbd, with the exeption that validate the rule being Sadako.

You want to ad japanese horror, cool, but maybe it was not where you should look for horror sticking to this game.

Ah yes, the greats of horror.
Vecna from DND
Literal kpop killer
Dracula from Castlevania.
Nemesis and Wesker from Resident Evil
Demogorgon from Stranger Things.

nemesis is scary, wesker is debatable.
Kpop killer is questionable
Dracula is a perfect addition in this game cause he is a horror type character I mean just do research on him he was feared in his land.
Demogorgan can be actually scary don't downplay him

Ken kaneki? dude is some edgy 2010 MC anime character that never came from a horror background ever.

[Emantor Of Nihility]

󠀡󠀡　WhyGamingWhy󠀡󠀡 a écrit :

♥♥♥♥ weeb stuff, literally no anime is scary, it doesnt have the atmosphere for it.

I could point you in the right direction