Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Also, could you please clear up something for me? You mention that you want Killers that you "can respect" and that can outplay you. And at the same time, you mention that because most Killers you encountered these days arent that, you understand why people get toxic.
But why must it be one of these? This isnt an "either - or" situation where you have to be toxic because you dont think highly of a person. If you dont like a person, so be it, but why the need to go out of your way and insult them?
SWF teams can do gens in 2 minutes. All this stuff is to dispose of one/two survivors quicker to get a fair game. Iri hatchet Huntress is nerfed to the ground, Hillbilly sucks nowadays. What are you even talking about?
you will understand why killers use noed and camp
What rank are you playing on? It's really rare in red ranks to see a toxic killer build. Some of them start to camp if they see no way to win. The iri huntress got nerfed and I havent seen one in ages. Trapper or Billy are super rare these days. Even noed isnt that common in red ranks since there are much better perks.
Yes it boils down to that. And yes, it does go both ways. I have played killer as well as I stated above and I got really drained by the toxic survivors that all have DS, all have BT, all have a flash light. But I understand them now. Survivors are inherently unable to fight back. If you tunnel one of their friends and they feel they want to help/save their friend. They can't. If the killer doesn't let them, they can't do anything about it. Bodyblocking and BT only goes so far.
Because if I see something that I think is injustice it pisses me off. I know this subjective. If I see a teammate survivor with like 30 hours in DBD playing with me. (I'm a profile checker) I want to help them and make sure they escape if any of us do. But if a killer then proceeds to facecamp that guy with NOED, and I later see that the killer has 500+ hours in the game I can't help but feel angry. And that carries over into the next game. And the next. And so on. Or another example. If I want to trade hooks with someone who did far better for the team. Someone who has looped the killer for 3 gens and is now getting facecamped while the doors are powered. I want to be able to have a chance to unhook him and give him the victory he deserves. But killers build to such an extend that it's impossible for me to do any of this. Their builds and playstyles make me feel absolutely powerless to achieve what I think is the right thing. So all I got left is to be a toxic bastard and make them feel bad. It's the only weapon this game gives me as a survivor.
Chicken or the egg kind of story. I'm only saying I understand toxic survivors now.
I meant Leatherface. My bad. Wrong killer name. Hillbilly does suck. Leatherface with his stupid eternal chainsaw and his speed makes outplaying him nigh impossible unless the killer makes a mistake.
I have and I do. I don't like it.
So something like t-bagging can be both toxic and not toxic, depending on your intentions. If you're trying to get the killer's attention to run them around and take pressure off your teammates, that's not very toxic. If you're t-bagging because you want to rub in how badly they are performing, that's pretty toxic.
The problem with calling anything in-game toxic or non-toxic however, is how people interpret your actions. It's very easy to misread the first case of t-bagging for the second and get angry at a person for making a tactical play, thinking that they're trying to disrespect you. This is why I try not to get mad at people for in-game actions. It's too easy to misunderstand their play and not realize they're actually distracting you from an injured meg, or a downed survivor.
Chat, however, both pre and endgame, is much more cut and dry because the person has the opportunity to speak to you directly and tell you exactly what their intentions are. There's still some ambiguity with jokes and sarcasm, but overall it's much clearer whether or not someone is disrespecting you, especially considering the game is over and they have no more motive to distract you.
So I'd say that being toxic in DBD is less about actions you take, and more about your mentality towards other players in the game.
I wouldn't consider any one side wholly to blame for toxic behavior. I think thats a cheap way to make yourself feel good and demonize the "other side."
as if you ever saw one at purple ranks
your name really does match your comment, hell of a punchline for such a good joke
When the game files are healthy the player base is. When it gets worse the players do too. Killer/Survivor they both get really bad when the game sucks to play. Read every other thread and see someone saying "I can do what I want RAWR the other side is playing unfair". These are the hard core players who keep playing when the game sucks. The worse it gets the more people say you know I kinda want to go to the beach....