Message To Survivors That Think I'm Bming Them

[DaSh]

If you simply hook someone and immediately hit them, to make them make less noise because you're tired of hearing loud @ss screams, it's not me bming.

It's like survivors don't understand that it actually does quiet them down some and they don't believe me lol.

[Teddy Roosevelt]

Nguyên văn bởi Mizuro:

Nguyên văn bởi Teddy Roosevelt:

how exactly does teabagging to get more attention at the end gate help anything?

Or on the other side of a just dropped pallet? The killer is literally looking right at you already.

Yes there are rare situations when somebody is trying to lure you away by running backwards and teabagging in the open because you are chasing their friends. That is not toxic. Its a mechanic being used as a mind game. There is a difference.
just like stabbing somebody to silence them is different from doing it over and over to illicit a reaction. Learn the difference and stop getting butt hurt.

Yeah because we all know killer mains only hit people on hook to stop that scream!

Both actions are "toxic", just because 'don't do it for toxic reasons' doesn't mean it isn't toxic. It's a toxic action. That scream isn't hurting you. Literally turn your game down if it hurts that bad. If 99% of killers can handle it, you can too. OR...

Keep doing it, and don't complain about tbagging.

nobody ever said that killers dont do it to be mean. I only said that it actually serves a purpose. Teabagging at end game or on the pallet when you stun somebody serves no purpose outside of bm. It changes nothing in the game like the extra stab does. Its plain mechanics.



if you read my previous posts youd know this has nothing to do with hurting your ears and i have pointed that out more than 3 times now. Its about how annoying it is to be screamed at in the face on every hook. Even as survivor i hate it. If i could toggle it off in sound settings i would.

The two are not close enough for your analogy to hold water.

[Teddy Roosevelt]

Nguyên văn bởi Mizuro:

Nguyên văn bởi Teddy Roosevelt:

What exactly is the purpose of teabagging at the endgate when the game is already decided?

I'm crouching over and over to say goodbye to the killer and to give my pinkie a workout.

Don't use it too often y'know?

you could do many things to work out that pinkie, and you can say goodbye with the chat designed specifically for that kind of thing. You know the one built into the game to pop up after the match? These excuses dont add up.

[Charles Patenaude]

Nguyên văn bởi Teddy Roosevelt:

Nguyên văn bởi Mizuro:

Yeah because we all know killer mains only hit people on hook to stop that scream!

Both actions are "toxic", just because 'don't do it for toxic reasons' doesn't mean it isn't toxic. It's a toxic action. That scream isn't hurting you. Literally turn your game down if it hurts that bad. If 99% of killers can handle it, you can too. OR...

Keep doing it, and don't complain about tbagging.

nobody ever said that killers dont do it to be mean. I only said that it actually serves a purpose. Teabagging at end game or on the pallet when you stun somebody serves no purpose outside of bm. It changes nothing in the game like the extra stab does. Its plain mechanics.



if you read my previous posts youd know this has nothing to do with hurting your ears and i have pointed that out more than 3 times now. Its about how annoying it is to be screamed at in the face on every hook. Even as survivor i hate it. If i could toggle it off in sound settings i would.

The two are not close enough for your analogy to hold water.

The point of tbagging at a pallet is to keep aggro on you. This way the team is capable of doing the objective while you keep the killer's focus.

[Teddy Roosevelt]

Nguyên văn bởi Charles Patenaude:

Nguyên văn bởi Teddy Roosevelt:

nobody ever said that killers dont do it to be mean. I only said that it actually serves a purpose. Teabagging at end game or on the pallet when you stun somebody serves no purpose outside of bm. It changes nothing in the game like the extra stab does. Its plain mechanics.



if you read my previous posts youd know this has nothing to do with hurting your ears and i have pointed that out more than 3 times now. Its about how annoying it is to be screamed at in the face on every hook. Even as survivor i hate it. If i could toggle it off in sound settings i would.

The two are not close enough for your analogy to hold water.

The point of tbagging at a pallet is to keep aggro on you. This way the team is capable of doing the objective while you keep the killer's focus.

how does teabagging work mechanically in the game to keep aggro? the way stabbing works mechanically to stop screams? oh it doesnt? huh, how odd. Argument falls apart fast there. its almost as if the teabagging is trying to bm the killer into getting mad so they commit to bad chases. which is never a guarantee like it is with screams getting cut short. Its a mind game built on bad manners. Just like tea bagging in fighting games. it is a game style that is by design toxic. Toxic for a reason, yes. But toxic. Where as there is no toxicity in extra stab if your doing it for the mechanic. It doesnt need BM to work on the mind of the player for the scream to stop. The two are not comparable at this level.

one requires BM to work as intended, the other does not. Plain and simple. its just a mechanic built into the game.

[Tymothi]

Nguyên văn bởi Teddy Roosevelt:

Nguyên văn bởi Charles Patenaude:

The point of tbagging at a pallet is to keep aggro on you. This way the team is capable of doing the objective while you keep the killer's focus.

how does teabagging work mechanically in the game to keep aggro? the way stabbing works mechanically to stop screams? oh it doesnt? huh, how odd. Argument falls apart fast there. its almost as if the teabagging is trying to bm the killer into getting mad so they commit to bad chases. which is never a guarantee like it is with screams getting cut short. Its a mind game built on bad manners. Just like tea bagging in fighting games. it is a game style that is by design toxic. Toxic for a reason, yes. But toxic. Where as there is no toxicity in extra stab if your doing it for the mechanic. It doesnt need BM to work on the mind of the player for the scream to stop. The two are not comparable at this level.

one requires BM to work as intended, the other does not. Plain and simple. its just a mechanic built into the game.

"one requires BM to work as intended"

Hitting on hook is toxic, so rip your entire argument.

[Charles Patenaude]

Nguyên văn bởi Teddy Roosevelt:

Nguyên văn bởi Charles Patenaude:

The point of tbagging at a pallet is to keep aggro on you. This way the team is capable of doing the objective while you keep the killer's focus.

how does teabagging work mechanically in the game to keep aggro? the way stabbing works mechanically to stop screams? oh it doesnt? huh, how odd. Argument falls apart fast there. its almost as if the teabagging is trying to bm the killer into getting mad so they commit to bad chases. which is never a guarantee like it is with screams getting cut short. Its a mind game built on bad manners. Just like tea bagging in fighting games. it is a game style that is by design toxic. Toxic for a reason, yes. But toxic. Where as there is no toxicity in extra stab if your doing it for the mechanic. It doesnt need BM to work on the mind of the player for the scream to stop. The two are not comparable at this level.

one requires BM to work as intended, the other does not. Plain and simple. its just a mechanic built into the game.

I get hit on the hook when my chase lasts very long. It's a bit strange how it goes. People hit on hook to BM. That's it. You've played killer. I've played killer. I'm sure everyone here has played killer. The screams are an absolute non-issue. People tbag to be toxic. People hit on hook to be toxic. That is the reality. The point everyone here is making is that if you're fine with one then you need to be fine with the other. Saying one is fine because you do it while the other one isn't as you're the receiver is pure entitlement.

[Teddy Roosevelt]

Nguyên văn bởi Mizuro:

Nguyên văn bởi Teddy Roosevelt:

how does teabagging work mechanically in the game to keep aggro? the way stabbing works mechanically to stop screams? oh it doesnt? huh, how odd. Argument falls apart fast there. its almost as if the teabagging is trying to bm the killer into getting mad so they commit to bad chases. which is never a guarantee like it is with screams getting cut short. Its a mind game built on bad manners. Just like tea bagging in fighting games. it is a game style that is by design toxic. Toxic for a reason, yes. But toxic. Where as there is no toxicity in extra stab if your doing it for the mechanic. It doesnt need BM to work on the mind of the player for the scream to stop. The two are not comparable at this level.

one requires BM to work as intended, the other does not. Plain and simple. its just a mechanic built into the game.

"one requires BM to work as intended"

Hitting on hook is toxic, so rip your entire argument.

hitting on hook is only toxic if used over and over. if its used as a mechanic then how is it toxic? we already went over this in this thread.. Its a built in game mechanic that you can use. thats like saying that doing gens flashlights to blind is toxic because it makes killers mad. But its not. its just another mechanic regardless of who gets mad.

this is like the 3rd time you have brought up points that have already been discussed and put to bed. At least ready whats going on before repeating things that have already been shown to be false otherwise your just wasting everybodies time including your own.

[DaSh]

Nguyên văn bởi Teddy Roosevelt:

Nguyên văn bởi Mr Campalot:

Fake hypersensitivity to short screams on a hook, you probably saw a streamer doing it and copied them knowing this playerbase.

nobody is hypersensitive to sound. only annoyed by the scream. it covers other sounds and is jarring to hear right in your face. Hell i hate when i scream when hooked when im playing survivor. If i had the ability to turn it off i would.

Ya you're right Teddy. I wish you could turn off screams on hooks :/

Also imo it's more of how many times someone does something, if you crouch once it's not really toxic but if you do it 30 times it is and same with hitting them on hook.

Sircampalot, Ozone. and others are reaching, it's simply an annoyance that the screams are and it's easily remedied with hitting them.

[Teddy Roosevelt]

Nguyên văn bởi Charles Patenaude:

Nguyên văn bởi Teddy Roosevelt:

how does teabagging work mechanically in the game to keep aggro? the way stabbing works mechanically to stop screams? oh it doesnt? huh, how odd. Argument falls apart fast there. its almost as if the teabagging is trying to bm the killer into getting mad so they commit to bad chases. which is never a guarantee like it is with screams getting cut short. Its a mind game built on bad manners. Just like tea bagging in fighting games. it is a game style that is by design toxic. Toxic for a reason, yes. But toxic. Where as there is no toxicity in extra stab if your doing it for the mechanic. It doesnt need BM to work on the mind of the player for the scream to stop. The two are not comparable at this level.

one requires BM to work as intended, the other does not. Plain and simple. its just a mechanic built into the game.

I get hit on the hook when my chase lasts very long. It's a bit strange how it goes. People hit on hook to BM. That's it. You've played killer. I've played killer. I'm sure everyone here has played killer. The screams are an absolute non-issue. People tbag to be toxic. People hit on hook to be toxic. That is the reality. The point everyone here is making is that if you're fine with one then you need to be fine with the other. Saying one is fine because you do it while the other one isn't as you're the receiver is pure entitlement.

the whole reason i joined this topic is because i hit on hook to stop the scream and apparently so does OP. thats it. Not everybody does it to be toxic because it has an actual in game effect.

Teabagging does not.

Thats why one is different from the other in terms of use. hook stab has a purpose in mechanics. Teabagging does not.

thats why one gets a pass when used as a mechanic. The other has no mechanical purpose and thus receives no pass.

If you cannot see that difference i cannot explain it in a more simple way. Perhaps it is time to agree to disagree.

[Teddy Roosevelt]

Nguyên văn bởi DaSh:

Nguyên văn bởi Teddy Roosevelt:

nobody is hypersensitive to sound. only annoyed by the scream. it covers other sounds and is jarring to hear right in your face. Hell i hate when i scream when hooked when im playing survivor. If i had the ability to turn it off i would.

Ya you're right Teddy. I wish you could turn off screams on hooks :/

Also imo it's more of how many times someone does something, if you crouch once it's not really toxic but if you do it 30 times it is and same with hitting them on hook.

Sircampalot and Ozone are reaching, it's simply an annoyance that the screams are and it's easily remedied with hitting them.

yes. reaching so hard its like michael jordan at the end of space jam when he reaches across the court.

[Tymothi]

Nguyên văn bởi Teddy Roosevelt:

Nguyên văn bởi Mizuro:

"one requires BM to work as intended"

Hitting on hook is toxic, so rip your entire argument.

hitting on hook is only toxic if used over and over. if its used as a mechanic then how is it toxic? we already went over this in this thread.. Its a built in game mechanic that you can use. thats like saying that doing gens flashlights to blind is toxic because it makes killers mad. But its not. its just another mechanic regardless of who gets mad.

this is like the 3rd time you have brought up points that have already been discussed and put to bed. At least ready whats going on before repeating things that have already been shown to be false otherwise your just wasting everybodies time including your own.

Because you keep deliberately missing the point. Hitting someone on hook IS considered toxic by most people, no matter how many times you do it. You keep insisting it's not bm, but the general consensus is that it is. And then you get surprised when survivors think you're being toxic?

[DaSh]

Nguyên văn bởi Teddy Roosevelt:

Nguyên văn bởi DaSh:

Ya you're right Teddy. I wish you could turn off screams on hooks :/

Also imo it's more of how many times someone does something, if you crouch once it's not really toxic but if you do it 30 times it is and same with hitting them on hook.

Sircampalot and Ozone are reaching, it's simply an annoyance that the screams are and it's easily remedied with hitting them.

yes. reaching so hard its like michael jordan at the end of space jam when he reaches across the court.

lmao

[Teddy Roosevelt]

Nguyên văn bởi Mizuro:

Nguyên văn bởi Teddy Roosevelt:

hitting on hook is only toxic if used over and over. if its used as a mechanic then how is it toxic? we already went over this in this thread.. Its a built in game mechanic that you can use. thats like saying that doing gens flashlights to blind is toxic because it makes killers mad. But its not. its just another mechanic regardless of who gets mad.

this is like the 3rd time you have brought up points that have already been discussed and put to bed. At least ready whats going on before repeating things that have already been shown to be false otherwise your just wasting everybodies time including your own.

Because you keep deliberately missing the point. Hitting someone on hook IS considered toxic by most people, no matter how many times you do it. You keep insisting it's not bm, but the general consensus is that it is. And then you get surprised when survivors think you're being toxic?

general consensus among republicans is that the vaccine is bad or pointless. Does that make them right? in the 50s the majority of people thought butter was good for your arteries because it "lubed them" did that make it right? Regardless of what general consensus is, the truth is that its not BM. thats the whole point of OPs post to begin with. Hes trying to change peoples minds by explaining how its used. You just refuse to accept that it can be used in a non toxic way for whatever reason.

Nobody is surprised that people think you are being toxic by hook stabbing. but they are still wrong. Again, thats the point of the thread.

[Tymothi]

Nguyên văn bởi Teddy Roosevelt:

Nguyên văn bởi Mizuro:

Because you keep deliberately missing the point. Hitting someone on hook IS considered toxic by most people, no matter how many times you do it. You keep insisting it's not bm, but the general consensus is that it is. And then you get surprised when survivors think you're being toxic?

general consensus among republicans is that the vaccine is bad or pointless. Does that make them right? in the 50s the majority of people thought butter was good for your arteries because it "lubed them" did that make it right? Regardless of what general consensus is, the truth is that its not BM. thats the whole point of OPs post to begin with. Hes trying to change peoples minds by explaining how its used. You just refuse to accept that it can be used in a non toxic way for whatever reason.

Nobody is surprised that people think you are being toxic by hook stabbing. but they are still wrong. Again, thats the point of the thread.

You just brought up the community thinking something is toxic, and compared it to covid-19 deniers.

And yet those two guys are reaching?

[Acheroni]

Nguyên văn bởi Mizuro:

Nguyên văn bởi Teddy Roosevelt:

What exactly is the purpose of teabagging at the endgate when the game is already decided?

I'm crouching over and over to say goodbye to the killer and to give my pinkie a workout.

Don't use it too often y'know?

Another man or woman of culture I see