Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Here are some handy responses to beating a team and still getting called a bad killer.
"Guys, you don't have to go easy on me"
"I really hope rank 1 survivors are harder, this game is kinda boring"
"Do most killers fall for that tactic? Am I meta gaming right now?"
From my point of view, you didn't play with, but you did kill them.
A surv needs a spark of hope. That makes the game a thriller.
If you chase, down, hook or mori a survivor downgrades you from a killer to a delivery boy.
That makes you predictible and boring as hell.
Perhaps "l2p" (learn to play) means exactly that.
A good entertained survivor has no issue to die on the hook, as far as I know.
At least that's my opinion.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BwSts2s4ba4
"entertained"? So the killer has to "entertain" the survivors. Fantastic.
Some people are just bad losers, taking the game way too seriously.
This one time I managed to kill all 4 people and yet someone in the end chat was trying to teach me how to play Killer because I apparently wasn't doing it right...