Does having no perks ruin the game for you?

[Not Sneaky]

Like does going against a fully pimped out killer/surviors make the game less fun?

[Spudsy]

makes it more exciting as survivor tbh.

[clay gamer]

I think there should be a mode people can pick that is either A) Without Perks
B) Without perks for Survivors

[Raptorrotas]

going perkless is hardmode. its especially nice when you try a character you never played for daily rituals (especially as killer imo) against only fully decked enemies.

[Runiver]

Going Perkless as killer against high ranks is most likely suicide, since it will make the pallet looping as painful as it can be. The slow pallet destroy will allow way too much space, the low stun recovery too. No ruin will allow gen rushing, and no whispers will allow survivors to hide forever.

For survivors, just bring a medkit and you're on. They usually can even afford a perkslot just for BP, they'll only miss sprintburst to escape the first "hit" they're supposed to receive, eventually, which will make them play safer. But that's it, nothing grievous compared to killer.

But it's probably normal since killer is 1v4.

[Knobz]

perkless mode would make this a real game, otherwise its carebear pvp

look up the history of Ultima Online, this type of carebear pvp ruined that game which was the best pvp game of all time.

I think ranked should be perkless, those of us old school pvpers see this carebear stuff for what it is.

[Runiver]

Originally posted by exzordor:

perkless mode would make this a real game, otherwise its carebear pvp

look up the history of Ultima Online, this type of carebear pvp ruined that game which was the best pvp game of all time.

I think ranked should be perkless, those of us old school pvpers see this carebear stuff for what it is.

Perkless would make some killers (like Billy/Nurse and eventually Huntress) way stronger than other killers simply because they have ways to deal with pallets others don't (teleporting/hatcheting over them/Chainsawing). That would make the game boring. And because of WGLF, no one would play your "ranked" matches because it would be WAY less BP gain.

[Knobz]

Originally posted by Runiver:

Originally posted by exzordor:

perkless mode would make this a real game, otherwise its carebear pvp

look up the history of Ultima Online, this type of carebear pvp ruined that game which was the best pvp game of all time.

I think ranked should be perkless, those of us old school pvpers see this carebear stuff for what it is.

Perkless would make some killers (like Billy/Nurse and eventually Huntress) way stronger than other killers simply because they have ways to deal with pallets others don't (teleporting/hatcheting over them/Chainsawing). That would make the game boring. And because of WGLF, no one would play your "ranked" matches because it would be WAY less BP gain.

some killers SHOULD be stronger than others thats the whole point of having different killers.

those of us who play perkless against you carebears will never see it your way.

we used to pvp without armor to keep it fun, then comes millenials...

[Runiver]

Originally posted by exzordor:

Originally posted by Runiver:

Perkless would make some killers (like Billy/Nurse and eventually Huntress) way stronger than other killers simply because they have ways to deal with pallets others don't (teleporting/hatcheting over them/Chainsawing). That would make the game boring. And because of WGLF, no one would play your "ranked" matches because it would be WAY less BP gain.

some killers SHOULD be stronger than others thats the whole point of having different killers.

those of us who play perkless against you carebears will never see it your way.

we used to pvp without armor to keep it fun, then comes millenials...

No. The point of having multiple killers is to have diversity of play and mecanics. Pushing people toward certain killers will just make them overplayed and make the game more boring.

[保卫荣耀]

Originally posted by The Wizard:

Like does going against a fully pimped out killer/surviors make the game less fun?

No, it is more challenging and skill based:

http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=972582268

[Knobz]

Originally posted by Runiver:

Originally posted by exzordor:

some killers SHOULD be stronger than others thats the whole point of having different killers.

those of us who play perkless against you carebears will never see it your way.

we used to pvp without armor to keep it fun, then comes millenials...

No. The point of having multiple killers is to have diversity of play and mecanics. Pushing people toward certain killers will just make them overplayed and make the game more boring.

the game as of right now forces you to play certain killers to deal with perks. Its just like you say already

I know you guys love borrowed time, but it is the definition of carebear.

pvp should never be careber, but survivors wont see that because they are the carebears ruining this game just like Ultima Online, DbD basically two games now like Ultima, once they fracture the end begins.

[Runiver]

Originally posted by exzordor:

Originally posted by Runiver:

No. The point of having multiple killers is to have diversity of play and mecanics. Pushing people toward certain killers will just make them overplayed and make the game more boring.

the game as of right now forces you to play certain killers to deal with perks. Its just like you say already

I know you guys love borrowed time, but it is the definition of carebear.

pvp should never be careber, but survivors wont see that because they are the carebears ruining this game just like Ultima Online, DbD basically two games now like Ultima, once they fracture the end begins.

No it doesn't. At the moment, some killers are stronger than others because devs cannot balance for ♥♥♥♥ and are just too afraid to give buffs to ♥♥♥♥ that need buffs. (Like some survivor perks/killer perks, also to Myers & Wraith.)
If they would at least play their game more than 1 hour a week, I think they may be able to determine what's good/bad in their game. Tho that would be revelant if they could patch the game without introducing gamebreaking bugs that wouldn't allow people to play simply.

[Knobz]

Originally posted by Runiver:

If they would at least play their game more than 1 hour a week

you obviously dont really watch any of the devs if you think they play the game for one hour.

not_queen plays longer than that in one stream and she definitely points out problems and addresses stuff and thats just one person on the team and shes not even the actual devs coding stuff

typical carebear, fix the game fix the game, its actually your perks and requests that are ruining the game for real pvp for killers. Its a carebear hide and seek game now with invincibility perks, Felucca Weeps

[John Videogame]

Survivor you can usually survive without perks, obviously with perks makes you even stronger, but you dont absolutley need them.
Perkless Killer vs fully equipped survivors on the other hand is just asking to be bullied by survivors all day.

[Runiver]

Originally posted by exzordor:

Originally posted by Runiver:

If they would at least play their game more than 1 hour a week

you obviously dont really watch any of the devs if you think they play the game for one hour.

not_queen plays longer than that in one stream and she definitely points out problems and addresses stuff and thats just one person on the team and shes not even the actual devs coding stuff

typical carebear, fix the game fix the game, its actually your perks and requests that are ruining the game for real pvp for killers. Its a carebear hide and seek game now with invincibility perks, Felucca Weeps

Not queen isn't a dev. She's a community manager that is adressing her own killer/survivor problems to devs, like we all do, except she does have more impact over them because she is community manager. It's true that, before her, they were even more clueless, but they still are.

You seem to hate perks for no reasons tho. Perks and grind is what keep the game alive tbh. By adding more interesting perks and build, you add some diversity and surprise in the gameplay, which is a good thing, especially if you can experiment. Being scared of having something new is stupid, especially if they can make it balanced. I don't see how it's being a "carebear" if you put good perks to put to use on BOTH SIDES without them being "cheesy".

[Coucas]

I tried without perks on survivors and its actualy more fun and intense but with killer, man i just want to kill myself