Установить Steam
войти
|
язык
简体中文 (упрощенный китайский)
繁體中文 (традиционный китайский)
日本語 (японский)
한국어 (корейский)
ไทย (тайский)
Български (болгарский)
Čeština (чешский)
Dansk (датский)
Deutsch (немецкий)
English (английский)
Español - España (испанский)
Español - Latinoamérica (латиноам. испанский)
Ελληνικά (греческий)
Français (французский)
Italiano (итальянский)
Bahasa Indonesia (индонезийский)
Magyar (венгерский)
Nederlands (нидерландский)
Norsk (норвежский)
Polski (польский)
Português (португальский)
Português-Brasil (бразильский португальский)
Română (румынский)
Suomi (финский)
Svenska (шведский)
Türkçe (турецкий)
Tiếng Việt (вьетнамский)
Українська (украинский)
Сообщить о проблеме с переводом
Rather let's flip the question. Can you tell us any reason why ToS shouldn't be considered the spiritual successor to RO, because I think there's considerable weight for it to be considered as such.
I don't see how trying to turn away former RO players helps ToS at all. This game loosk and feels more like RO2 than the actual RO2.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tree_of_Savior
Of course they are doing better balancing it considering you don't get 1 shot asura strike by monk in this game.
That was pretty dumb for pvp on the receiving end.