Is it similar to Ragnarok Online?

[Rurik]

Is it similar to Ragnarok Online?

[Draconius]

Not at all, Ro is Ro TOS is TOS

[ho$tility]

yes it is, it was developed by the creator of Ragnarok. Dont listen to KanKung, hes a SJW

[jvjd]

Yeah but better :)

[Master Loli Hunter]

NO

[Rurik]

Wow
Thoughts are divided by 50/50

[Butler]

I'll give you an honest opinion.

The game belongs in the same genre, in that the art-style, job system, aesthetic, and combat are all relatively similar to one another. And since RO2 was a big flop, RO players were looking for something to scratch that itch. That's about the time when TOS came around.

When TOS first came out, it was also a mess, but as of today, the game feels more pleasant and playeable than where it was at release.

And if it's the grind you're worried about, I'll state that it isn't as bad as RO was.

[Rurik]

SpaceButler님이 먼저 게시:

I'll give you an honest opinion.

The game belongs in the same genre, in that the art-style, job system, aesthetic, and combat are all relatively similar to one another. And since RO2 was a big flop, RO players were looking for something to scratch that itch. That's about the time when TOS came around.

When TOS first came out, it was also a mess, but as of today, the game feels more pleasant and playeable than where it was at release.

And if it's the grind you're worried about, I'll state that it isn't as bad as RO was.

Thx for explaining. I try to not play MMO games, because they suck a lot of time
But if you say there is no hard grind - i ll take a couple of hours

[Zapp]

NO IT IS NOT.
If you expect to find some sort of Ragnaroek here, you'll be disappointed.
Whoever says otherwise hasn't played both games.
ToS is a simple grinder with focus on character development. Perfect for watching a movie or series while playing.

[jvjd]

liantis24님이 먼저 게시:

NO IT IS NOT.
If you expect to find some sort of Ragnaroek here, you'll be disappointed.
Whoever says otherwise hasn't played both games.
ToS is a simple grinder with focus on character development. Perfect for watching a movie or series while playing.

Becuase one is more grindier or has more depth than the other doesn't make it TOTALLY diffrent

Both are grind based games
Both have similar progression systems, stat, ability,card systems,costumes etc
Both have the same anime art style and same playstyle

The core aspect of the game is the same ^ and thats what really matters

If you are coming from ragnarok you will feel at home here but ToS has just a lot more to offer in every department

Even afk farming is similar here we have necros there we have alchemists bwahahahahahaha

[Zapp]

Almost every single player who expected a Ragnaroek-like game was badly disappointed. Believe me. It was like that since the test phases. So many people got p1ssed off because they got misled into thinking ToS would be some sort of Ragnaroek X. It is not.

There are a few similarities, but it is a totally different game. Please stop misleading people.

[Byte]

Beside the ONE HUGE Difference that this Game is absolutely Linear and Ragnarok is Open world, It´s actually darn frkn close to being a Sequel of Ragnarok Online.
But thats the Point that may dissappoint tons and tons of Ragnarok Players, You quest straight for 200 lvls and then you Grind with barely any choices which Grind area to pick, not like you explore 50 Areas randomly until you find ones you can beat consistant with your specific Elemental stuff.
But thats literally the one big difference, the rest is almost the same, Ofc there are differences like MvP Hunt, in ToS is more like a Group/Server activity instead of Solo walking 2 hours arround maps to hopefully find a uncontested mvp to kill and pray for the 0,1% chance.

On the other Hand Ragnarok online evolved for Ages, like 20 years by now, And most of the ♥♥♥♥ Ragnarok players enjoyed the last 12 Years, wasn´t even there in the first few Years.
It´s a good Game with alot of flaws, what ruined the Game for me, but i had my 500 hours Fun with it, Somewhat missed Opportunity, on the other Hand you can´t build a Copy like Ragnarok anymore and make it successfull like old Games, The big reason why WoW - Ragnarok were successfull, cuz there was almost no competition, but in a World where every single Game, does something better than another, People will just spread and go on to the next, when the Game requires several Month of Grind or even a Year in RO.

[Byte]

People tend to set RO to a unbelievable high Horse, that it makes me sad :D The best and most awesome thing about RO was that it had the absolute best Community in the World, not even half as much Players would´ve played it, When it had a Community of our Days now.
Just looking in this Thread here how insulting People get when some People have other Opinions.

[jvjd]

False_PR0phET님이 먼저 게시:

Beside the ONE HUGE Difference that this Game is absolutely Linear and Ragnarok is Open world, It´s actually darn frkn close to being a Sequel of Ragnarok Online.
But thats the Point that may dissappoint tons and tons of Ragnarok Players, You quest straight for 200 lvls and then you Grind with barely any choices which Grind area to pick, not like you explore 50 Areas randomly until you find ones you can beat consistant with your specific Elemental stuff.
But thats literally the one big difference, the rest is almost the same, Ofc there are differences like MvP Hunt, in ToS is more like a Group/Server activity instead of Solo walking 2 hours arround maps to hopefully find a uncontested mvp to kill and pray for the 0,1% chance.

On the other Hand Ragnarok online evolved for Ages, like 20 years by now, And most of the ♥♥♥♥ Ragnarok players enjoyed the last 12 Years, wasn´t even there in the first few Years.
It´s a good Game with alot of flaws, what ruined the Game for me, but i had my 500 hours Fun with it, Somewhat missed Opportunity, on the other Hand you can´t build a Copy like Ragnarok anymore and make it successfull like old Games, The big reason why WoW - Ragnarok were successfull, cuz there was almost no competition, but in a World where every single Game, does something better than another, People will just spread and go on to the next, when the Game requires several Month of Grind or even a Year in RO.

I felt as Ragnarok evolved it got ruined bit by bit
I left the game when acid demo got introduced back in 2008 i believe, broken ability rendering +10 upgrades and one entire stat line useless

I agree you can't get perfect balance BUT come on atleast try :P

In this game however i see devs actually trying to do something

[letsTPKothers]

There are some things they have in common, but I agree. Very different games. Alot of what made RO cool, just is not there in TOS. The player shop system, for example, is SUPER linear. They cut all the neat unigue concepts from TOS, that most RO players thought for sure would be there. Some are there, but just an afterthought. TOS has little to offer RO fans, especially if you were into the cute cosmetic stuff, but that does not mean it is a crap game. It is worth checking out, but to say they are alike is just absurd to me.

Same genra for sure, but nothing alike.

[FREE MMR]

ez of savior