What's better - Disabled Hunger or Natural Health regen?

[guyk iller]

we've been playing with hunger disabled since we find eating food to heal slightly more intuitive and forgiving than the traditional hunger and slow health regen system but i'm legitimately starting to wonder if natural health regen is actually better? Spells like troll's blood and health regen buffs dont work with hunger disabled on, and im not sure if having to rely on food for healing (aside from pots and spells) is actually easier.

[Speed Malus]

Well you can get Natural Health regen to 1 every 1 sec or even faster with the usage of Regen items and spells

[MightyLad]

i feel its less a question of "what works better" and more one of "how do you prefer it". i prefer the added stress of having to maintain hunger, but thats purely opinion. if you want a less stressful, yet more active run, keeping hunger off is probably for you. but in terms of whats more effective, it would probably vary with circumstances. i mean, the healing spell alone would easily remedy the lack of regen, but having to eat to heal otherwise could suck if you run out. i dont know if they changed it, but last i checked, turning hunger off made all food heal just 5 hp, which means eating meat is the same as eating cheese. (which is one of the reasons i dont play with hunger off, cause that kinda sucks to me.)

but again, i feel like its more about how you want to play, rather then what works better.