Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Usually with catapults,I would need 2 builders per catapult +2 spare,whereas without is just 2/1 to build.
The towers are going to ge an upgrade come New Lands.
Btw archers in towers also hunt rabbits
The idea is that you cannot get 50~ archers and win the game,it motivates you to apply solid drefences to get you through the nights.
It's not about dealing with the stones. It's the fact that, as it's so easy to recruit archers they become much more effective than catapults (and safer for your army). If you haven't done a run using just archers and knights (with a few workers) and ignore towers and catapults you might see what I mean. There is no high risk high reward with catapults, just high risk.
Heh, just buying the stuffs for a completion and because im puking money everywhere, If I wanted to do a serious run, wouldn't buy it
Yes but a horde of archers (very easy to aquire and require no one to operate them) is just as effective. Plus the main problem of behemoths throwing rocks back at you does not exist with archers. With a volley of arrows you don't have to worry about luck.