Cannot zoom scopes

[E_Z_Points]

I cannot zoom my scope views, no matter what scope I use. My mouse wheel (zoom in and out) works fin in SGW2 Multiplayer but not in SGW3 Multiplayer. Does anyone have any idea what's going on?

[HunterKiller]

I can't, either.

[jaaay85]

You need to reach Level 9 to get the scope attachment. They really need to bring that down to level 2. It doesn't take long to progress in Bounty Hunter mode.

[HunterKiller]

Ah, ok. Didn't know that. Kind of stupid in a way, to be a sniper with no scope zoom until, you reach a certain level.

[jaaay85]

Originally posted by Mr. HK, to you sir.:

Ah, ok. Didn't know that. Kind of stupid in a way, to be a sniper with no scope zoom until, you reach a certain level.

Definitely and most of the maps are next to unplayable without the zoom. Best way to level up is the Village map. They don't make it obvious, it should be clear that is the level you need to reach. It's well worth the effort but I strongly believe they need to reduce the level it unlocks.

[E_Z_Points]

Thanks for the replies. Like everyone is saying, there's a whole lot about this multiplayer that really Sucks. Even with the cheaters, SGW2 multi is better than this. The devs really took a step backwards. Well, not too surprising for CI.

[JUST]

The market wants progression to better equipment. Personally i dont like it, but we only have the majority of gamers to blame

[jaaay85]

Originally posted by anisakis:

The market wants progression to better equipment. Personally i dont like it, but we only have the majority of gamers to blame

SGW is not Call of Duty. They don't know their player base. They tried something new probably without consultanting any players and its not what we want. Some progression is okay but not zooming a sniper rifle, come on, bad idea.

[JUST]

Originally posted by netnerd85:

Originally posted by anisakis:

The market wants progression to better equipment. Personally i dont like it, but we only have the majority of gamers to blame

SGW is not Call of Duty. They don't know their player base. They tried something new probably without consultanting any players and its not what we want. Some progression is okay but not zooming a sniper rifle, come on, bad idea.

You can't use that argument since it's too broad a statement for it to be of actual use. Do you represent all of the players that play SGW3 multiplayer? No you don't, so without solid data the company goes by the general trend that they think most players will enjoy.

[HunterKiller]

Anyway to just use the iron sight? I don't like this noob ass scope.

[jaaay85]

Originally posted by anisakis:

Originally posted by netnerd85:

SGW is not Call of Duty. They don't know their player base. They tried something new probably without consultanting any players and its not what we want. Some progression is okay but not zooming a sniper rifle, come on, bad idea.

You can't use that argument since it's too broad a statement for it to be of actual use. Do you represent all of the players that play SGW3 multiplayer? No you don't, so without solid data the company goes by the general trend that they think most players will enjoy.

You don't own SGW1 or SGW2 so... you've only just joined the franchise my dear which means you have very limited exposure, aka you dont know what you're talking about.

[MTL5]

Originally posted by netnerd85:

Originally posted by anisakis:

You can't use that argument since it's too broad a statement for it to be of actual use. Do you represent all of the players that play SGW3 multiplayer? No you don't, so without solid data the company goes by the general trend that they think most players will enjoy.

You don't own SGW1 or SGW2 so... you've only just joined the franchise my dear which means you have very limited exposure, aka you dont know what you're talking about.

The existence of SGW1 and SGW2 doesn't really mean anything, though. Playing SGW1/2 doesn't make your opinions on SGW3 any more valid. The target audience of SGW3 is not specifically people who played SGW1/2. It's more complicated than that. If you're not careful you start straying into "true fan" nonsense.

SGW3 is kinda the game for people who hated the previous games in the series. It's the polar opposite of those games in a number of ways.

[JUST]

Originally posted by netnerd85:

Originally posted by anisakis:

You can't use that argument since it's too broad a statement for it to be of actual use. Do you represent all of the players that play SGW3 multiplayer? No you don't, so without solid data the company goes by the general trend that they think most players will enjoy.

You don't own SGW1 or SGW2 so... you've only just joined the franchise my dear which means you have very limited exposure, aka you dont know what you're talking about.

I still dont see data. Here, let me try doing what you're doing: 6 millions Jews didn't die in the holocaust.

Boy, that was easy.

[MTL5]

Originally posted by anisakis:

Originally posted by netnerd85:

You don't own SGW1 or SGW2 so... you've only just joined the franchise my dear which means you have very limited exposure, aka you dont know what you're talking about.

I still dont see data. Here, let me try doing what you're doing: 6 millions Jews didn't die in the holocaust.

Boy, that was easy.

Poor taste joke.

[jaaay85]

Originally posted by MTL5:

SGW3 is kinda the game for people who hated the previous games in the series. It's the polar opposite of those games in a number of ways.

What on earth makes you say that? SGW3 is very similar to SGW2 and in some respects very similar to SGW1. Let me explain WHY.

SGW1 had the elements of Sniping, Sneaking (Ghosting) and Warrior, the run and gun sections of the game which were taken out of the console version (maybe just PS3 version, not 100% sure). A lot of people felt they were poorly handled and felt out of place so they went hard in on the sniping for SGW2 which was fantastic but they took out the spotting. The MP for SGW1 had no prone which was a huge upset and the no cross was something people wanted even then.

SGW2 went for sniping only, huge focus on Story which was great (played through so many times and only game on steam I've 100 percented). The MP was mostly warmly welcomed because of the prone change. Hacking and glitching still an issue as with SGW1, crossing was not restricted but the maps felt better designed for targetting crossers. The ammo refills is something people were grateful for. The DLC for SGW2 and the rise of Sniper Elite made people think they wanted an open world game so it became a request (one the CEO of CI Games says was a mistake for their studio to make - it open world).

SGW3 is a mix of aspects and new elements. It like previous games is good. They have done something new and original enough with all games in the series, which is fantastic and unlike most game series. There is plently to praise and plenty to complain about. You don't have a successful game series without the franchise fans following you and encourging others to play the game. You don't get many people jumping on board an established franchise unless it is standout amazing.

@anisakis, grow up.

[JUST]

Originally posted by MTL5:

Originally posted by anisakis:

I still dont see data. Here, let me try doing what you're doing: 6 millions Jews didn't die in the holocaust.

Boy, that was easy.

Poor taste joke.

Its not a joke. It's a representation of how rediculous frivolous claims can be. I thought you were insightful enough to recognize that.