Kauppasivu
rFactor 2
Kaikki Keskustelut Kuvakaappaukset Taideteokset Suoratoistot Videot Workshop Uutiset Oppaat Arvostelut

rFactor 2

Kauppasivu
Näytä tilastot:
Maailmanlaajuiset saavutukset
rFactor 2 > Yleiset keskustelut > Aiheen tiedot
LokiD1978 14.8.2016 klo 14.34
Rf2 Visuals not as bad as people make out?
http://steamcommunity.com/id/lokid78/screenshots/?appid=365960&sort=newestfirst&browsefilter=myfiles&view=imagewall#scrollTop=1

All in game grabs no Photoshop here! Yes its not pcars but it has a realistic feel to it.
Viimeisin muokkaaja on LokiD1978; 24.11.2016 klo 12.23
Tämän keskusteluaiheen laatija on merkinnyt viestin vastaavan hänen kysymykseensä.
Klikkaa tästä hypätäksesi kyseiseen julkaisuun.
Alkuperäinen julkaisija: Marketcrash16:
Rfactor 2 has realistic graphics, where as Pcars and Assetto have graphics that look like a Hollywood movie...sort of "better than real life" if that makes sense. I have no problem with either, but I think some struggle with RF2 because it is a gpu hog.
< >
Näytetään 1-15 / 49 kommentista
JoeSpeed 14.8.2016 klo 17.26 
Problem is, post something like this and people ignore you because "fanboy".
#1
Tämän ketjun aloittaja on ilmaissut julkaisun vastaavaan alkuperäiseen aiheeseen.
Marketcrash16 14.8.2016 klo 18.22 
Rfactor 2 has realistic graphics, where as Pcars and Assetto have graphics that look like a Hollywood movie...sort of "better than real life" if that makes sense. I have no problem with either, but I think some struggle with RF2 because it is a gpu hog.
#2
JoeSpeed 14.8.2016 klo 18.33 
Marketcrash16 lähetti viestin:
Rfactor 2 has realistic graphics, where as Pcars and Assetto have graphics that look like a Hollywood movie.

Well said.
#3
metalhead 15.8.2016 klo 7.47 
RF IS GREAT SIM BUT GFX ARE BORDERLINE BETWEEN OK AND BAD.
sorry for the caps..
With ac it depends on pp filters ...there are some nice mods for that.
Also you dont have to use all the settings/effects.
GFX are surly the weak spot of RF and often imertion killer.
Viimeisin muokkaaja on metalhead; 15.8.2016 klo 7.49
#4
JoeSpeed 15.8.2016 klo 12.49 
rF2's graphics are never as bad as people say they are...
#5
hefewe1zen 15.8.2016 klo 14.19 
Car models and textures are really nice (partial thanks to the modding community), tracks look outdated to me.
#6
JoeSpeed 15.8.2016 klo 15.00 
StruckOutLooking lähetti viestin:
Car models and textures are really nice (partial thanks to the modding community), tracks look outdated to me.
Depends on the mod/track. Suzuka looks perfect.
#7
Bwana 16.8.2016 klo 0.58 
looks fine to me
#8
quf 16.8.2016 klo 14.40 
Marketcrash16 lähetti viestin:
Rfactor 2 has realistic graphics, where as Pcars and Assetto have graphics that look like a Hollywood movie...sort of "better than real life" if that makes sense. I have no problem with either, but I think some struggle with RF2 because it is a gpu hog.
Where's the hollywood? image: https://scontent.flis2-1.fna.fbcdn.net/t31.0-8/14053880_1503201056372874_3148259867130418322_o.jpg
#9
JoeSpeed 16.8.2016 klo 19.01 
"Please note that this picture may have been created using customized or modified post-processing effects."
#10
quf 17.8.2016 klo 3.18 
JoeSpeed lähetti viestin:
"Please note that this picture may have been created using customized or modified post-processing effects."
Then show me a normal gameplay screenshot that looks hollywood or unrealistic.
#11
Engicop 17.8.2016 klo 6.04 
Marketcrash16 lähetti viestin:
Rfactor 2 has realistic graphics, where as Pcars and Assetto have graphics that look like a Hollywood movie...sort of "better than real life" if that makes sense. I have no problem with either, but I think some struggle with RF2 because it is a gpu hog.

At least those games have proper sunlight.
#12
XShortestStrawX 18.8.2016 klo 10.34 
RF2 doesn't have "poor" graphics. But they are far from great. Bland textures are the biggest difference in comparison to the other major sim racing titles. Graphics aren't what really matters anyway.
#13
Marketcrash16 21.8.2016 klo 14.41 
quf lähetti viestin:
Marketcrash16 lähetti viestin:
Rfactor 2 has realistic graphics, where as Pcars and Assetto have graphics that look like a Hollywood movie...sort of "better than real life" if that makes sense. I have no problem with either, but I think some struggle with RF2 because it is a gpu hog.
Where's the hollywood? image: https://scontent.flis2-1.fna.fbcdn.net/t31.0-8/14053880_1503201056372874_3148259867130418322_o.jpg

Only a fanboy gets butthurt by a comment that isn't even an insult. FFS. While I am not a fan of Pcars as a game, I split my time almost exactly 50/50 between Assetto and RF2. AC graphics (imo) are better than RF2, my point was that AC is more polished and looks like a showroom. It's a compliment not an insult.
#14
quf 22.8.2016 klo 10.58 
Marketcrash16 lähetti viestin:
quf lähetti viestin:
Where's the hollywood? image: https://scontent.flis2-1.fna.fbcdn.net/t31.0-8/14053880_1503201056372874_3148259867130418322_o.jpg

Only a fanboy gets butthurt by a comment that isn't even an insult. FFS. While I am not a fan of Pcars as a game, I split my time almost exactly 50/50 between Assetto and RF2. AC graphics (imo) are better than RF2, my point was that AC is more polished and looks like a showroom. It's a compliment not an insult.
No, your point was that AC has Hollywood graphics, thus saying it isn't real life like, but just like make up on someone's face...

"Rfactor 2 has realistic graphics, where as Pcars and Assetto have graphics that look like a Hollywood movie...sort of "better than real life" if that makes sense."

'Better than real life' and 'hollywood' has a negative connotation in this case, because you refer to other sim as realistic graphics while for other it isn't realistic anymore.

Just so you tell me, where are the hollywood graphics here in this AC gameplay screenshot: http://i.imgur.com/2UU2t3u.jpg
#15
< >
Näytetään 1-15 / 49 kommentista
Sivua kohden: 1530 50

rFactor 2 > Yleiset keskustelut > Aiheen tiedot
Lähetetty: 14.8.2016 klo 14.34
Viestejä: 49

Keskusteluiden säännöt ja ohjeistukset