Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Well I hope 36 players atleast...24 still too few. NEXT GEN PLS! xD
Seems extremely low, i guess this is what you get when gameplay is retarded to work on
"Next Gen"outdated low end pcs slapped inside plastic console shells.
Heres to another 6 years of PC gaming being held back by Microsoft and Sony
The zone is pretty tiny, if you try to go for 64 player you will see people nonstop crossing your path. For large scale multiplayer I stick to BF4 64player servers, if I want to be able to fire every single shot of a gun without missing a player even if I aim in the air I will go for 300v300 Planetside 2. (which afaik you can even do on the consoles, so its not that a console limitation is holding the game back)
No it would not I would instantly refund if they added that trash garbage.
well said sir. +1
I've only heard 24, and judging by the open beta, that seems about right. No way near 64. Also the issue with such a small group of people is that it will be easy to gather two full four man teams and team grief in DZ.