Mobile Cover Vs Smart Cover.

[Okami]

Can somone tell me why one would use Mobile over Smart ???
therre are plenty of cover in the game. Why whouild I want another one ? It's not like it will protect me when i'm shooting anyway (Like a shield would)... and also it has hitpoint... unlike standard cover.

So ? better performance ? well Smart do just that. On area, so you can move for grenade and still be buffed.

Maybe worth using both to be extra buffed ??

PS : I admire the "suspension in disbelief" this game requires. How can you turn a piece of concreat "smarter" ? What a "smart cover" does even mean/imply ? the taxi trunk you use suddendly tells you "hey buddy, they try to flank you up ! probably should see my friend the bus stop overthere, he got a pretty good spot"

[Serangel]

Ive seen a few techniques useing mobil cover, back when falcon lost came out, there wa one where somene would set one up in the trench efectivly creating a box where all team members could be in cover as enemies came down. I do agree though, smart cover is way more useful than mobile cover how ever with 1.4 i feel like both are less useful than they used to be. Before, everyone would just load up on as much defense, stay under smart cover, and tank what ever came out them, now you cant do that so much in WT 4 and mobility seems to midigate more damage than hunkering down.

[Misha]

Just try use them at same time with Hungry Hog in PVE, then you know...
That was what I done.

[Voss]

Honestly, I like the idea of Mobile Cover but I feel like it's just not that useful in this game. I'd love to be able to use it in a game like Halo, Cod or Battlefront.