Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
But it's cool, i didn't ♥♥♥♥♥ about it, i wasnt happy sure - but i still bought all of the content CA threw at me.
Is it too much to ask to make an extra effort and create something original and good looking? It It seems like people actually fine with mediocrity, but that's not enough, they go as far as defending and making excuses to why this is o.k.
What a bunch of clowns man.
Without overcasting, the spell lets the caster transform into one of three things - a Feral Manticore, a Black Hydra or a Horned Dragon. When overcasting, they can become either a Mountain Chimera (of which you provided an image) or a Great Fire Dragon.
Of those five creatures, only one already exists in TWW and is the one currently restricted for the spell. As I mentioned earlier in the thread, however, there is nothing stopping them from introducing the other creatures somehow down the road. I expect that they only used the Feral Manticore option because it was the only one already in the game and they didn't want to go through all the work of designing a model for the others until it could be used elsewhere in the game (even though it's an established IP, Creative Assembly would still need to go through the full design process - from concept art to final model - for any of those creatures, the Manticore's already been through all of that so they just had to remove the rider).
I half-expect that once we get a faction that can field Hydras or Dragons, we'll be getting those creatures in. I'm not certain of that, but it would make sense to save such creatures for when they can be used in the game for more than a single spell.
I like your answer.
Agreed. But now I want the next unit DLC to be aerial orca mounts for my wizards.
correction
you are getting a new modeled wizard for the empire, with a new lore of magic so far only used by him and the beastmen, who also gets a reskinned griffon, and his signature spell is to summon a unit that is otherwise not available for you to recruit, and top of this you can keep summoning once every battle for free. and you get all this for free.
question why only just disspointed with this? it is THE MOST common practice in the media industry to reuse props and assets where and when possible to save money. I can understand your complaint if you was to spend £5 for the guy but are getting this for free. did you expect a completely new mount or did you just want the guy to have the exact same mount option as his other fellow wizards
fair to people a griffon is a griffon, sure they will look different skin and fur wise, but it will still have wings, a beak, claws, tail and what ever else a griffon may have. you got a nice retextured animal, along with what else i mentioned at the top.
Anyways,Warhammer Griffons are literally reskins of each other,except for a few specials.
Like having 2 heads and ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥
What did you expect them to add with the Amber wizard ?
Also,considering we only have the Manticore available in the game currently,the transformation of Kadon was not exactly surprising.I'm sure the current content will be expanded on the future that makes them similiar to TT.
https://www.games-workshop.com/resources/catalog/product/600x620/99120202030_AmberWizardonGriffonNEW01.jpg
But i guess im stuck with ugly reskin instead.
okay okay, listen come close, come close. even if they did have a griffon with a extra head which will mostly be a cosemtic thing, it will still have a ungly reskin. okay good glad we got that out the way
Were such a mount to be added to the game, it would be a separate mount from the normal Imperial Griffon and only available to Empire Generals and the as-yet-unimplemented Battle Wizard Lords (think a lord version of the normal Empire wizards).
fml
The focus feature is the completely uniquely modelled Amber Wizard, not his choice of mount. The mount is extra, and by no means needs to be something totally new.
TW is far from the only franchise to do reskinning like this, it's a common industry method and it gets the job done. I certainly wasn't expecting the Jade Griffon to be anything more than a reskin when I first heard about it simply because we already have two Griffons in the base game who are reskins of each other - the Griffon for the generic General of the Empire and Deathclaw, Karl Franz's personal Griffon.
Still a whole bunch of people defending artistic decisions with no experience in game development. lol. If only you guys actually knew how much work went into game development, it would stop half your comments on games from the beginning... and then it would put you into 5x as much fury as now to learn when you are in fact getting less then 5 hours of work for 20$. - That's a little inaccurate actually considering the NEW campaign... which honestly is the most time consuming development portion of this update... which should upset anyone who wanted MORE in the grand campaign instead of a small-ass wretched mini-campaign.