So, how good or bad are Celestial Wizards, and why?

[Corvus_Alt1]

The response I seem to see is that a lot of people see the Celestial Wizards as being one of the worst ones just after Lore of Metal. Is this really the case, or no? If so, why? Mostly asking because I would normally think that one would give Karl Franz a Celestial Wizard for lore reasons.

[Glorfindel]

it's a good lore, the only problem being that only bretonians and the empire have access to it and both have a better lore for support : the lore of life.
Especially considering the lore of heavens was used for its melee debuff, now you can just heal it's better than just debuffing the damage chance.
Harmonic convergence was good too but again, regrowth is better at single-target buffing.

If chaos had this lore for example, I think it would become the most common choice even though death lore (spirit leech, fatalitas) and shadow lore (passive + pit) are both great.

[[GW] Darling]

Comets mate, they are blue and blow up big.

[Vestment [yager]]

Urannons thunderbolt is amazingly good vs any clumped up units, and the gust spell is awesome vs low armour units.

[Corvus_Alt1]

So, if I were to give Karl Franz a Battle Wizard, which one would you recommend? Still Celestial, or one of the others like Bright or Shadow?

[StarofTanuki]

Цитата допису Corvus917:

So, if I were to give Karl Franz a Battle Wizard, which one would you recommend? Still Celestial, or one of the others like Bright or Shadow?

Jade

[RED /(Weber)\]

I always thought they were good myself, they pack more power than Bright Wizards who are literally mentioned in the tooltips as being magic artillery. Offensively, I will always choose them over bright wizards, support wise, jade wizards as mentioned.