Grail Guardians or Questing Knights?

[Crimson Emperor]

Title.

[Kazaanh]

Squire > Knight Errant > Knight of the Realm > Questin Knight > Grail Guardian

thats how it goes lore wise

[Captainbeastfeast (Rat-ee-JiK)]

questing knights for me, do more damage and cost less. CAn even fight toe to toe with demigryphs with halberds!

[StarofTanuki]

Questing Knights , i don't like defendsive cavalry .

[Crimson Emperor]

ohh ok

[Crimson Emperor]

grail guardians suck then?

[StarofTanuki]

Originally posted by Crimson Emperor:

grail guardians suck then?

no not suck , but they are wrong consept&role , Bretonian's army need something attack enemy hard before their infantry die , but Grail guardian design for tank damage and kill trash unit.

[Crimson Emperor]

oh ok then so i'll use the grail guardians with the questing knights

[Crimson Emperor]

along with some infantry with the grail guardians

[gachi is manly]

Guardians are better against lower armor targets, and they're better at holding in melee even against anti-large infantry if they don't have high armor (they can actually beat Wildwood Rangers.)

Against high armor targets like Chosen/Dwarfs, Questing Knights will do much better. Guardians can hold high armor targets, but they can't kill them worth a damn unless they're fatigued. Same goes for Grail Knights that also lack armor piercing. Questing Knights is what you want if you think you'll be fighting lots of high armor enemies.