Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
If one game is based on another it doesn't make either of the games better or worse, and people can still choose to pay for a little different game even if they have played the free Orbiter, as long as these games are at least a little different, and I can see this one is mission based with some goals pre-set for each mission, while Orbiter is sandbox where you set your own goals or fly anything you choose. Having missions/goals set in the game may be what some people prefer better.
Anyway, if you check Orbiter, don't forget checking its new beta version, too, which adds quite a few new features as also support for even higher planetary texture resolutions and terrain elevation data (if you can't find it link to Orbiter-Forum is in my Steam profile).