Is this like battlefield?

[Punished_Stallion]

how are the visuals also?

[McWafflez]

No it's not like battlefield you will die and kill much quicker in this game. I'd say the graphics are on par with battlefield 4 although the player models move a bit jankier when taking cover. If you try playing like in battlefield you will die quite a bit. It's kind of like Insurgency if you own that.

[TwistinFool]

You have to play in a completely different mindset in this game. Seriously. Take it slow and easy. You will die A LOT and you won't know where it came from. If you like realism at all, you'll enjoy this.

[Punished_Stallion]

So if i just like winning and doing the objective will i be good?

[McWafflez]

Originally posted by Chrisgol10:

So if i just like winning and doing the objective will i be good?

Yes it is sort of like a one directional conquest. The defending team depends on the map so the japanese would be defending iwo jima and US would defend maggot hill ect.. You also get all the german vs russian maps with Rising Storm. (pick red orchestra 2 in the server browser for those)

[Gardenho]

Play the rifleman. Move to and stay in the objectives that are being attacked/defended. If you happen to get a kill, great! Once you figure out the game it is a blast.

[Hans_Morgen]

Yea DO NOT play like you would battlefield (run and gun all over---you will die that way), this game requires teamwork and supression/cover. I enjoy it much more than battlefield as it's way more intense when having firefights, only downfall is it's an infantry game, some maps have tanks/halftracks...but not many.

[Owmar]

more realistic

[JolyJew СлаваУкраине]

to be fair, also in battlefield you need to constantly move from cover to cover and be slow, but that's what it was in BC2, donnu how they did it in the later ones

[Ratatoy]

No.

Completely diffirent game.

[Kraft ☢ Squad]

The visuals are not on par with battlefield 4.

[Mr. Do Everything]

Originally posted by Kraft:

The visuals are not on par with battlefield 4.

RO2's are better.

[pipi long stocking]

Originally posted by Khorne Berzerker:

Originally posted by Kraft:

The visuals are not on par with battlefield 4.

RO2's are better.

not even close. while RO 2's graphics are not bad , BF4 graphics stomp on Ro 2's graphics

BF4 beats R02 in graphics , and vehicle variety and implementation, in 3 years TWI added 2 vehicles. and DICE adds them on a whim.

that's where BF4's praise ends.

gameplay wise, R02 slaughters Bf4. no contest.

[Moskeeto]

DICE has a gigantic budget and development team. Their sound team alone is bigger than TWI was when they developed RO2. Of course BF's graphics are going to be better and of course it's going to be easier for them to create new content (they just decide to charge for it).