Instale o Steam
iniciar sessão
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chinês simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chinês tradicional)
日本語 (Japonês)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandês)
Български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Tcheco)
Dansk (Dinamarquês)
Deutsch (Alemão)
English (Inglês)
Español-España (Espanhol — Espanha)
Español-Latinoamérica (Espanhol — América Latina)
Ελληνικά (Grego)
Français (Francês)
Italiano (Italiano)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonésio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandês)
Norsk (Norueguês)
Polski (Polonês)
Português (Portugal)
Română (Romeno)
Русский (Russo)
Suomi (Finlandês)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Relatar um problema com a tradução
The OP made an assumption based on his opinion. His opinion did not stand up to the truth as others see it in their opinions.
The rest is just the usual how it can be 'better' and some historical information thrown in. Another fun day here on the forums.
They where mainly used to disable or distract tanks in order for the AT or German tanks to finish the job. The weapon never saw full potential because there where not many elite units left alive by the time it reached the front. Was a high skill weapon that required bravery. Unfortunately there where mostly given to Volksstrum. I wonder how effective they could of been if released sooner and put in the right hands on the west and east. In the end about 2 million where fired and they got around 300 confirmed tank kills which is not very significant.
They also had to be trained with on the spot once recieved by troops which no doubt lead to alot of "accidents". The backblast from one was lethal up to 10 meters.
They where well built with high quality control and almost always went bang. Was a weapon ahead of its time. I was a little puzzled to see the mkb 42 in red orchestra. I mean they where around but not mass issued. Makes sense that its not the stg44 i guess but rather the prototype. At least they have the MG-34 which was just as good as a 42 if not better and is missing from alot of other games.
"Full-auto 360 shotgun spray bro"
Can you give me your word that post scirpt is RO3 and that all the trash went to RS2? Cos I will jump ship mate.
In a HEAT round the warhead comprises of an explosive charge within a copper cone. The nose hits the explosive goes off, forced into a 'plasma' jet by the copper cone, the jet burns through and the copper cone turns into a high velocity 'slug' that follows the jet through the armor 'hopefully' and does the damage.
I have seen a US training film from WW2 which explains the warhead shape and tail of the panzerfaust made flight pretty erratic, so not very accurate. And like you stated had to be brave to get close enough.
The US bazooka 2.36 rocket launcher was found to be wanting also so the rule was shoot the tracks and immobilize it and let bigger assets take it out.
As a modern comparison in my day we had the M-72 'LAW' (light anti tank weapon) was a 66mm disposable rocket launcher. Range stated and sights out to 400m but hits aginst a standing target 200m away were iffy at best and penitration against a T-55 or T-62 of our day was poor, so we were also told to go for the tracks.
As for quality control, a few now and then are discovered and do still work 70+ years later. Interesting ignition system. You unscrew a cap and place a what looks like a 9mm blank in and rescrew cap, and then press down on striker lever to get it to fire. Also heard that the warhead had a tendency to go boom if dropped or stuck something hard while carried.
I have fired the MG-34 at demonstrations and a great gun, also fired a MG-42 and the modern MG-3 the grandson of the MG-42. Both are pretty bouncy when fired because of cyclic rate. Carried a US M-60 in my career and found it better than the 42 or 3, but would of prefered a modernized MG-34. Sometimes modern is not always better.
Again read up on the German logistic issues and how they had far more effect on the way the war was fought than many realize.
FSB- Yeah i saw Fury it was the most fake laughable american propaganda war film i think ive ever seen in my life. It was insultingly bad. If a panzerfaust did infact penetrate to the interior of a tank that copper slug would of wasted everyone inside. So i guess it was more capable of killing everyone inside then it actually was at disabling a tank. I heard older vets like yourself explain how that copper would literally shower and be almost liquid if the shape charge did penetrate through steel.
That movie was so ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ bad it was unacceptable. Shows a whole battalion equipped with Panzerfausts marching yet 1 or 2 are used in the movie? A whole battalion pinned down by a single tank with completely open flanks to either side? Yet they run directly at it like russians for a full day? ♥♥♥♥ it was bad. It was painfully bad prob the worst ww2 movie i have ever seen. The young officer at the end who spots the guy udner the and lets him go would of been hung lmao.
Amazing that the next disposable closest thing was the Law in the 70s that might have had a longer effective range but was very dangerous and didnt even work half the time. Truly a weapon ahead of its time and introduced ironically too late.
More than not that 'slug' was hard enough to bounce around inside, the RPG2/B-40 we saw in the training films would penitrate the M113's aluminum armor and form that slug and bounce around inside shredding whatever it hit pretty well.
Oh BTW war films are always designed to be propaganda and take a lot of license to alter the reality. Fury was full of errors and misconceptions, but made a point, By that time in the war the Americans as well as Germans were scraping the barrel for replacements, a typist as a co-driver was a potential as the pool of expierienced was pretty much empty by April 1945. America was broke and as well tired of the war in Europe as well as Pacific. You need to look at the 'big' picture of these films rather than nit-pic based on your perceptions.
You make horrible assumptions about war and the people in it. Compassion as well as other human factors play a big part of mans behavior in war. It was not a game, and with the war coming to a close that NCO just wanted more than likely to justify his humanity more than anything political. He had to live with himself after the war if he survived, and who would know he left the kid under there. You are the product of the modern 'gamer' perceptions of history and learn your history from the games you play inaccurate as they are.
I remmember when Saving Private Ryan came out and watching 80+ year old men leave the theater in tears just after the or during the beach scenes. Something was triggered. Your anti-American opinions are just that, you have a bias and instead of looking at the overall picture you prefer to nit-pic at the reality of the era.
History and War are a ♥♥♥♥♥, you can not teach any war accurately as in today's PC world young minds can not accept the world 70+ years ago. Look at the WW1 movie They Shall Not Grow Old for example, 100 years later who is left from then to tell you if it was real or wrong.
End of the day....
I present a review.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VevSeqYg3sA
So much better look how well the map design and graphics is.
Makes RO2 look like Doom 64.
See you on RO2:V
It does need a better GPU to run vs RO2, so a Nvidia TNT2 wont cut it.
RO2 is dead.
Time to get with the times, get off the hacker infested RO2
Once again: "NO....you are entitled to your own opinion, not your own facts. RS2 is 'deader' than RO2, sorry." It's a long term issue, not a flash in the pan RS2 increase. RS2 fluctuates in numbers far more than RO2. And old does not mean obsolete and new does not make things better.................nature of gaming, some are classics, others are just blah.
What a load of diabolical dogs vomit!
RO2, RS & RS2 are all terrific games so where's the fire?
Agree. RO2 can die out every night but its not dead.... Id call RS dead tho at this point lol.
Again April 1945, end of war is coming, war crimes trials post war were the thought of every SS man, and what do you know of man's behavior in a time of war other than your Hollywood or game perceptions? There are plenty of real stories of the humanity of warriors towards the defeated, no matter how many comrades lost. Go ahead give us some of your perceptions and base them on actual events or personal expieriences of those who were there. Unfortunately America has covered Europe's arse twice, not a popular thought for most today. And living in America's attic must be frustrating. And leads to a lot of anti-American, no citation drivel that is as well all to regular today from those like yourself.