1v1 Ranking System... How is 3v3 the foundation of this game?

[Picatsu]

You guys need to incorporate a 1v1 ranking system? I understand the whole 3 man cell is pretty much the foundation of the shinobi but come on. Playing 3v3's made me realize that players are compensating for their lack of. There's always an "oh sh*t" button when things get real.

Oh sh*t, I blew all my sub jutsus let me just swap in and out until they regenerate.

1v1 requires way more skill because you rely on way less resources. You learn the characthers way more and actually grow fond of them, instead of the secret combination jutsu. Which is also BS. They have 3 chances to land their jutsus? Thats dumb.

The most epic battles in Naruto were 1v1 battles. (Madara vs First Hokage, Naruto vs Sasuke, Sasuke vs Itachi, Gaara vs Deidra, etc.) In the actual Shippuden, I don't remember that many 3 man cells fights ,besides in the beginning phases of the Fourth Great Ninja War, that would even make me think this game would primarly focus on a 3v3.

Its like you have this great story line you guys continue to add too. But yet the only abilities you continue to add are available only to 3 man cells. I would love to see different variations of Gaaras ultimates. Orichimaru def needs new ultimates. He was the main characther for most of the damn Naruto series and you've kept him with the same damn abilities and the worse awakening I've ever seen. How about having him awaken into the white snake that he fought Sasuke with? I feel you truly half assed Orichi.

I mean we get it. The more players on the field the more you can tweak their actual Secret Jutsus. But you have a WHOLE DIFFERENT FAN BASE THAT PREFERS 1v1 and refuses to do the 3v3 but would love to see some type of random title or achievement for their countless hours they put into the game as well.

[Abbock]

in team battle, there are definitely more ways to defend and get out of a bad sitution. however, it also gives more opportunities to be aggressive.
landing a hit in 1v1 is basically impossible without making an unsafe commitment.

[Picatsu]

TurtlePower_r님이 먼저 게시:

Picatsu님이 먼저 게시:

This guys is really trying to argue this. Haha, it's clear that you already have a bias opinion about 3v3. Nothing in my statement was incorrect. You literally have two extra subs or dashes that are implemented in a game and you're stating that it make the game easier? You have someone that can jump in the game and shield you while you're charging chakra? And or do damage or send a projectile in order for you to regain composure. The debate isn't what mode has additional variables that make the game more strategic. The statement was 3v3 is WAY easier than 1v1. You cannot dispute that. Sorry.

I disputed it plenty, the fact that you are unable to comprehend it, is another matter. I doesn't surprise me when I read your take on the game in other threads. It's pretty obvious that you play the game at a low level, so I'm not really surprised.

Unable to comprehend it? Lol get outta here. I've beat you personally, over and over. So clearly, your "low level" statement is based off just anger since I'm crapping on your 3v3. You're bad. I can prove that time and time again easily =)

[Picatsu]

GNT4 Abbock님이 먼저 게시:

in team battle, there are definitely more ways to defend and get out of a bad sitution. however, it also gives more opportunities to be aggressive.
landing a hit in 1v1 is basically impossible without making an unsafe commitment.

Exactly my friend, the concept of having more opportunities to avoid and mitigate damage makes it easier. It also makes it more STRATEGIC. These are facts. Turtle Power is just a little hurt that I'm downplaying the only mode that he can obtain a win. Boo hoo.