Google earth for quest?

[xAstroBoy]

Will google earth support quest?

[xAstroBoy]

ˆ åµ †˙´ Îøç†ø®¡ の投稿を引用：

Hey all, it's a me, Eric. I made this post awhile ago: https://support.google.com/earth/thread/17731303?hl=en and I still stand by my argument, Earth for mobile and Earth Pro are both used on lower-end devices than VR (Laptop, Computer, Phone) so there should be no issue whatsoever running it in VR, especially the Quest. I wouldn't really expect superb performance on the GO though. However, everyone that is saying the Quest is crappy or that the processing couldn't handle it at all should definitely try and get a degree in computer technology. You will find out that you are quite wrong.

Yeah, i own a Quest and the Rift S, there's no difference unless just some textural drop, but The quest is definitely able to run Google Earth if ported.

[SiEgE]

lyndonguitar の投稿を引用：

Nicholas の投稿を引用：

Quest isn't a very good headset

lmao its the best headset in the market right now.

wireless PC VR and a standalone VR on its own

xAstroboy1910 の投稿を引用：

Nicholas の投稿を引用：

Quest isn't a very good headset

if you dont own one, just dont write stupid stuff.

hahaha! It's called learning about stuff before buying.
There are currently just 2 pros to the Quest:
- No cable
- Cheap

And the rest are just cons.
The only way to make Quest decent performance-wise is to buy the cable, which will also eliminate both pros at the same time, making it a budget segment, cheap, mediocre headset that is not really different to the rest of the cheap-to-mid segment.

You guys just don't know better.

[Kavus Kazian]

I bought a Rift S and a Quest, and tried them both. The Quest has a clearer picture even when streaming over Virtual Desktop, and the IPD is adjustable so it doesn't make me sick. I can literally see no difference in picture quality between the Rift S and the Quest, except the Quest has a sharper picture. I noticed no compression artifacts. It is less comfortable to wear, though. I sent the Rift S back because it made me slightly ill the entire time I used it.

And yes, I really want GE VR for Quest.

[xAstroBoy]

ok の投稿を引用：

Kavus Kazian の投稿を引用：

I bought a Rift S and a Quest, and tried them both. The Quest has a clearer picture even when streaming over Virtual Desktop, and the IPD is adjustable so it doesn't make me sick. I can literally see no difference in picture quality between the Rift S and the Quest, except the Quest has a sharper picture. I noticed no compression artifacts. It is less comfortable to wear, though. I sent the Rift S back because it made me slightly ill the entire time I used it.

And yes, I really want GE VR for Quest.

maybe you need a pair of glasses, i would consult a doctor if i was u.

Agreed, you really need a pair of glasses, the difference between quest and rift S , the RIft S is worth more!
The quest can't and it won't be able to run with high graphics and sharper images.

[OreoGamingGeek]

Interesting...every word of what you just said...is wrong.

[xAstroBoy]

OreoGamingGeek の投稿を引用：

Interesting...every word of what you just said...is wrong.

Is not wrong.

[Kavus Kazian]

Yes it absolutely is. And I don't need glasses, I can see perfectly fine. The Rift S just can't be adjusted for the distance between your eyes, that's the main issue. The Quest absolutely can run with high graphics. It runs perfectly fine. Anyone who says it doesn't is literally lying. You may not think it's as good as the Rift S, and that's fine, but to say it literally can't do high quality graphics when streaming PC VR is a flat out lie.

[Huntlol]

You already can, its called oculus link

[jake_ochmonek]

Can we please stop discussing headsets? This thread is not about whether it will be *better* to have Google Earth VR natively on Quest, it is about having it at all, period.

When I talk to people who are not into VR and show them some stuff, Google Earth is the killer application which gets them hooked. With a hit ratio of 100%. Everyone who saw it immediately understood the power of VR.

This is really what it's about: If we want to let people experience Google Earth VR in the most convenient way, just a headset without the need for a gaming rig, we must continue to advocate the port to the Quest, no matter what compromises would be necessary.

Anyone agree? I hope anyone from Google is reading this, I have no idea how I can reach out to them…

[OreoGamingGeek]

Google doesn't care. They never have. The only thing they care about is world domination. The fact that they haven't updated this app which could, as so many people have said, be the "kiler app" which gets tends of thousands or more people into VR when it costs them so little of their ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ MASSIVE profit margins shows that they're more interested in collecting your every thought via Android and their IOT things, rather than actually creating something innovative.

[Bob Arctor [NoThreat]]

ok の投稿を引用：

Demodulated の投稿を引用：

In case anyone is legitimately looking for an answer to this, I use the Oculus Quest with Virtual Desktop which lets me play SteamVR games over wifi with no cables. It's fantastic, and especially liberating in exploration software like Google Earth VR.

Hilarious, the video is much compressed and the framerate is really low, it's very far from fantastic, it just don't compete vs real headsets

If this has been your experience, you're doing it wrong. I use the same setup. No framerate loss, no tearing, no compression.

To anyone using Virtual Desktop, and having quality issues. Have a powerful enough PC, use the 5GHz spectrum on your router, hardwire your PC if practical. No issues whatsoever.