Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-1ca6uFvq8Y&ab_channel=RandomMechwarrior
I enjoy the HBK-4G with 3xRAC2. It has relevant quirks and very nice high mounts.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9KKa1d0NeE&ab_channel=RandomMechwarrior
I enjoy the FNR-5 with 4xRAC2 and 3xERSL. Massive DPS for short exposure times with ECM. Needs to be skilled out for heat for this to work.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xZLEwIYuuaQ&ab_channel=RandomMechwarrior
RACwacker is literally the worst thing you can do with the chassis, and i have no idea exactly why people keep suggesting it other than because it 'can'
a bushwacker's hitboxes are great for wiggling in between bursts and ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ awful for staring, plus the low-slung, close-track mounts means that any attempt to wiggle away from fire mid-stream will lead to all of your fire flying off into the aether, while 'mechs with a wider track could still at least get one gun on-target while wiggling
UACwacker is better than RACwacker in literally - not figuratively - every single possible use-case and it's by a country mile
Among assaults you can equally use Hatomoto-Ku, Cyclops, Corsair, Mauler and Annihilator to mount 3 RAC2s.
Undergunned. You either do 3xRAC2 or 2xRAC5.
Remember that jeager can't properly brawl with other mechanics, so avoid direct confrontation. Acting as supporting fire while enemies are focused on other mechs is pretty useful. I'm not a pro player obviously but that gameplay has saved my Jaeger from being a silly sniper.
RACs are a projection weapon, and benefit a lot from the mobility that an agile chassis like the Bushwacker provides.
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2394694672
Could say UACs in general are a better weapon than RACs in every practical way honestly. I've seen so many people run Marauders and Bushwackers with RACs just stare nonstop that I've started focusing heads on Marauders again since they don't bother wiggling.
The RACs at least work when the things aren't taking much return fire, and the hitboxes of a Bushwacker are at least better than them running out in a Jagermech and trying to face tank, but honestly any mech doesn't last that long when face tanking the way RACs and machine guns require.
Anyway to OP: You really don't want a 50-65 ton mech for RACs, and just a couple RAC2s is going to be really bad. RACs are a weapon that requires that you just out tank and out DPS your opponent, best mechs for that are assaults, Annihilators, Fafnirs, stuff like that with a couple RAC5s paired with some UACs so you still retain some burst but a lot of extra DPS when you can bring the guns to bear. With that your goal is to just beat down whatever opponents commit rather than poke, as RACs are incapable of really dealing with people who are poking out to attack and then hiding after anyway, and assaults are really all about committing to a spot.
IF you do go with a lighter mech for RACs you're relegated to fire support duty, stick with an assault mech to draw fire off of yourself and then add DPS to the fight against targets that aren't focused on you. Having some additional support options like ECM or AMS to further support the group would be good for the team overall.
Thanatos is a pretty good heavy that can run a lot of builds with dual ballistics up high including dual RAC5 or if you find you dislike them you can swap in dual UAC10s or dual gauss or whatever, the big feature though is it's ECM. Really no reason to not just go ahead and use a 75 tonner if you are going for a heavy, a heavy slot is a heavy slot in the matchmaker, doesn't matter if you're only 60 tons, and having some heavier armor, ability to optionally add jump jets, high mounts, ECM, and multiple alternative good build options is probably a lot better than going for something like a jagermech or rifleman that dies to a stiff breeze and gets focused more.
https://mech.nav-alpha.com/#8cf77ba7_COR-7A
P.S get a real mech like a MK2 with 2 ac10 or uac10 and lasers and missle's and go nuts and have some fun.
Is there any evidence you could share regarding this point?
You just don't know how to use the RacWacker. slap on 2 RAC 5's. It's meant as a fire support mech. You get behind your assault and lay down massive fire and never stop shooting until everything is dead. It's amazing. Makes your enemies panic, run for cover and die because they get so confused by their screen exploding and shaking while your team finishes them off.