The Jarl's List

[Captain Michael Vulpi]

so most of us are aware of this website and what entails for MWO my question has anyone noticed some inaccuracies in it's data reporting.

[The Fifth Horseman]

In my experience, as far as I've seen it follows PGI's leaderboards[mwomercs.com] to a T - as it should, since it's supposed to be scraped from those.

[Maddermax]

Yeah, the base data should be identical to the official leaderboards, as it's where the data for Jarls list comes from.

The only issue you might have is their ranking system, which uses an average match score weighted by your class uses, allowing those who tend to use lights and mediums to actually compete with those mainlining Heavies and Assaults.

Also, it includes information from both Quickplay and Group matches (as do the official leader boards), and I'm of the opinion that they should be separated out, but that's the same as the official leaderboards anyway, and not something Jarl's can change on its own.

[Captain Michael Vulpi]

No what seems off to me is well it's listed my current usage of mechs as 77% heavy which is accurate enough but 0% in all the other classes which I don't think is how maths works the other 23% does have to be amongst those three classes and all can't be 0%

[Maddermax]

Originally posted by Captain Michael Vulpi:

No what seems off to me is well it's listed my current usage of mechs as 77% heavy which is accurate enough but 0% in all the other classes which I don't think is how maths works the other 23% does have to be amongst those three classes and all can't be 0%

You only get on the board if you have... I think it's 10? Matches in a particular class in a month. As such, you've done 77% in heavies, and the other classes haven't reached the 10 game threshold, and so show 0%.

That's a PGI leaderboard thing, so that very low game players don't show up at the top of the KD Ratio/WL Ratio boards because they had one good game and stopped playing. Jarls scrapes data from there, so if you don't show up on the Medium leaderboards (for instance), you get marked 0%, even if the stats from playing mediums is included in your overall score.

[Ishan451]

Originally posted by Captain Michael Vulpi:

my question has anyone noticed some inaccuracies in it's data reporting

Not really. I know the website exists, but much like the ingame leaderboard its absolutely meaningless for the game.