Napoleon or Medieval II?

[Uncle Philly]

Both Medieval II and Napoleon are down to 3.50 Euros for Total War week, but I can only buy one of them, since I spent the rest of my money on my Rome II pre-order. So, which one do you guys think I should get? I've played Medieval for quite a while and I'd say it's my favorite Total War game. I haven't spent any time at all with Napoleon, though. It looks like a good game, everything Empire was supposed to be, minus the bugs.

So, basically, it comes down to multiplayer for me now. Which game has better multiplayer? Which game has a more active community?

[Waka Waka Eh Eh]

both games to me are more about single-player campagin. i think the mulitlplayer for napoleon total war would be more active since its newer than medieval II. also it all depends on if you like musket battles or not. if you like musket battles get napoleon if not get medival II or shogun 2 if you didnt get that yet.

[Red Eye]

Both good games, Napoleon i feel does have better A.i

[accel]

i love medieval cause of all the units and ♥♥♥♥ just having a platoon of elite units slaugther civilian milita inside their city crowding in the city is awesome

[Uncle Philly]

OK, one more question:
Is Napoleon's Grand Campaign map the same as in Empire? Are the Americas and India present? Or is it just Europe and North Africa?

[☠ANTONIUS☠]

just europe and north africa but if i was u i would buy med if u all ready have etw no point in getting ntw its a great game dont give me wrong it does tell u alot about the napolion and how he gaind power but other than that u can repair ships and thats more or less it