Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I've tried turning everything off and even on low it runs way worse than all my other games regardless of SLI being on or off, and this is on a pair of Titan X cards (not the 2016 versions).
Yes, the best card in the world of two years ago runs a five year old game fine.
Oh. Now that you mention it, wouldn't 144 FPS be closer to an ideal frame rate for a five-six year old game?
MSAA is also well known to be a buggy anti-aliasing method. It actually killed my Watch_Dogs 2 performance.
A room in this game has more objects than an entire fov in an open world game like rdr2.
MSAA isn't 'buggy.' Go look up what it actually does, then maybe you'll understand why it kills performance.
I'll look it up. I know all kind of Anti Aliasing is quite demanding. I'm not stating it's the developer's fault at all; I didn't express myself correctly.
I normally don't really care about FPS as long as it's playable. My first PC (not counting my C64) had 4mb RAM and 80mb HDD so I know the feeling :D