Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
C2077 should be evident enough why a created character V can never compete against a preset written character like Geralt.
Deus Ex: The protagonist is Adam. If the protagonist can customize the game, those who originally supported it may be disgusted. It's like Iron Man "Anthony Edward Stark" was replaced by someone else. This example happened in "DMC", I didn't start playing until the white hair dlc appeared. This is really interesting, but it also diminished my interest in "Devil May Cry".
But like a spider man, it is not clear who the protagonist is, and the change will be less disgusting.
2077: There is no protagonist problem in this game...The game is more bugs make it hard to play.
The problem with the other is that although the game can customize characters and clothing matching, the game uses a first-person perspective.
So the answer is obvious from the first-person perspective, it is not the game character that has happened, so players cannot look at the game with a funny mentality,It happens to yourself that will make the player angry.
To be honest, there is no need to customize characters and costumes in the game,Because of level restrictions and clothing restrictions, it is also difficult to make yourself look good or match what you want.
The above is my definition of the role of the game.
2077 is a good game, but
Finally, this is my personal opinion:
I also like to play the game of "Saints Row: The Third"and "Saints Row IV"
I like to see how Adam respond any situation, despite the fact that there might be two ways
to express his feeling one with rudeness the other one being a bit more gentle.
I like JC but JC definitely feels more like a RPG character. I don't think that he is a cop or anything. It does mostly what the player wants. But Adam has a personality or a past. For example in MD, I can not play lethal. why would Adam start killing cops while also working for the Interpol? In Deus Ex 1, JC will do anything.
Would I mind if they make a remake of Deus Ex and make a character customization like Dark Souls? No, and if that the case I hope that his brother is exactly as my character(that's how I imagine how clones are).
But in the case of Adam, it would not make any sense because Adam has a past, it seems to have a way to sort things.
I disagree, Fallout, Skyrim do a great job creating a character and not having a preset written character. Even the nameless hero in Gothic.
Would it be cool to make a customization character in Witcher? Hell no, that's Geralt's story.
When i compared it to C2077, i wasnt comparing character creation vs preset characters in general because you cannot, its subjective on many levels. I was making a point when the story is protagonist driven, its better to have preset character than character creation. Not at a single point I felt like I was roleplaying as myself in C2077, despite trying to make him look as much as myself, I was still playing as this street talking merc V. I played a second time as the default V from the trailers and it felt so much better, probably wouldve been even a lot better if they just stuck to a preset V like they did with Geralt.
So my point, Stick with Jensen, or bring Paul in the next trilogy or whatever, deus ex doesnt need character creation. Warren Spector was only trying to fill this game with as much freedom and options as possible, which is great on a gameplay perspective but it was narratively shortsighted. Because, later he had to retcon all those other options and stick to one string anyway.
Customisation for inclusivity, lore and story will stick to one. Same stuff with KOTOR etc. Just some flexibility in this department won't hurt the game or the narrative in a long run. However, for any of that to have sense we would need a non Adam deus ex, as someone said earlier, it's Adams story rn, and it should stay that way for a sequel.
What I'm saying it's how I interpret the character and why I would not care much if I had the power to customize, I did not feel while playing JC that JC had a story or a choice given, more like the player choose his path. I feel that it could have been design as anyone else and I could choose what to do with him. That's how I picture JC, more like any other character I have made in Skyrim or in Fallout. It's just a character with cool voice acting and sunglasses.
But in the case of Adam, It would be strange, because he has more a back story than JC. Changing Adam would be like changing the story of Ciri and Geralt etc
That's why in Mass Effect I choose female Shepard because she looks already cool.
In Fallout, It's more like other RPG I change everything. (FO4 is a bit messy, because it's a RPG with a character with a story that was not finished.)
1: Actual written characters with a personality with only slight deviations by player choices
Adam Jensen
Geralt
Corvo Attano
Garrett
2: Whereas RPG characters where its completely player driven and almost impossible to portray
Dragonborn
Vault survivor from Fallout
Commander Shepard
Warden from Dragon age
or basically any RPG character
JC belongs in the written character category because he is, and customizing him has no effect on his character, behaviour his personality or the Deus Ex lore, he is the JC everyone knows alike, not different how you play him.
Playing as an asian JC or a woman JC is not only wrong and pointless because JC is already established, it destroys the 20 year narrative across all games just for some newcomers who for some reason have never played or liked Deus ex till now, but having a woman character is gonna magically pull them in, is that what a developer should be aiming for anyway? Its called alienating your fans and audience and selling out for some cheap marketing points. We all know what happens when you market wrong.
I'm just saying how I will react if they put a customization in Deus Ex 1. I would not care and I would not be surprise.
if they end up doing it just to appease people that follows an agenda, it's going to annoy me mostly because they wouldn't care about the game.
And I just don't care about all the politics that lately devs are trying to put in their games. I always liked Lara Croft, Elaine Marley, Elizabeth, Ciri, Marie from Silent HIll 2 etc It seems that they want make us think that magically there were not good female characters because old devs did not give them a chance. Which is ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥.
Id rather have them stick to Jensen for more games, as there are 20+ years to account for between MD and the first Deus Ex and the entire Denton gene plot. Paul is appointed to Unatco in 2040, they can move on to him later. Regarding Paul's looks in current gen, it will be the same as Jensen as hes most probably the parent clone, so they can just use the same face model with minor alterations and new VA I guess.
Fun Fact: Jensen looks was designed based of all three Denton brothers, Paul's goatee, Alex's hairstyle and JC's basic appearance, mannerisms and diction. Whether its an homage or a direct indication that they have the same genetic template, its a given JC, Paul and Alex would look very identical to Jensen in current gen.
It's a shame that it's an IP that could not reach all its potential. I would not have mind if they did the same that it's done in Yakuza, reusing one or two cities and just introducing more places just for missions. And letting the game evolve.