Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
You can't take back what you do in real life.............................. its done and you face the consequences..........
Also can you use paragraphs next time, wow thats a big wall of text.
Its pretty simple.
To me though, being realistic, high command has sent you on an absolutely vital mission with limited resources, do you really think they'd get you to compensate the traders in wartime?
I think not.
With regards a back button, it's not something we're looking at implementing. It would change the flow of the game too much.
Hey devs,
why don't you introduce some lesser punishment earlier on to get people used to the idea.
I think the issue is, that when he saw the 2 options, he would have prefered to just engage the enemy in battle rather than try either of those 2 options. Realistically, nothing should prevent him from saying: "Screw it, I'm not going to risk hitting the transport and I am certainly not going to pay those swines. eat hot plasma orthani scum!"
The forced choice is very "gamey" and totally immersion breaking.