Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
Survivor shouldn't be removed, it is a role that is purely neutral and can win with anyone. Anyone who has issues being a survivor or playing against one is simply not thinking properly.
Survivor should never claim survivor for this specific reason. Survivor claiming curvivor is like godfather claiming mayor when there isnt a possibility for a mayor.
The game needs more roles and taking one that can essentially win with anyone takes the variance out of the game.
If someone is afraid of a survivor turning on town then kill them, otherwise ignore them like people do jesters and executioners.
I mean if you know someones a survivor the vig can just shoot them if town is that afraid.
Survivors are meant to "survive" oh wow thats a hard concept to wrap my head around, therefore they will side with anyone that is winning or has the highest chance of winning. If you explain to a survivor how your side can win chances are they will side with you because they win with everyone.
Simply put i think survivor needs a rework where he can visit people instead of a bulletproof vest which allows him to emulate his targets position (if he visits 1, he cant die if someone visits him, if 1 is visited by a killing role then the survivor dies that night as well). I think it would fit the whole "survivor" sense better than the bulletproof vests, give the sense of trying to survive rather than waiting to be killed and gives survivor the capability of actually doing things.
I really miss jester being able to "visit" to annoy people but it didnt really serve a purpose.
In the end, survivor is fine, it just requires more thought to be put into your actions.
Though I guess it's not that common now that townies are onto "survivors"
In my experience, evil roles claim Survivor majority of the time, that's why they get targeted. So blame all the evil people hiding behind the Survivor role that has made townies wary of trusting anyone that claims Survivor.
And, as someone else mentioned, Survivors have a bad reputation of siding with mafia so town will get rid of Survivors to prevent that. If Survivors sabotage the town from winning then the Town will make sure Survivors don't win either.
P.S. Anyone else notice that Survivors are leaving Day 1 too?
So yeah, kill them all immediately. Sad truth, no 'neutrals' are really worth courting as town. Amnesiacs who want to side with town should grab a town role asap, because I'll execute them on claim too.
Agreed. Townies who ignore jesters and Exes as well usually regret it late game when they side with the mafia or refuse to vote. I always tell Jailors or vigs to target players acting like exes and jesters. They don't lose their ability to execute when they shoot a Neutral so they should target them indiscriminately.
Survivors, Exes and jesters can doom a town if they live to end game. When the town needs just 1 more vote and the Neutral refuses to hang the obvious mafia and the remaining town can do nothing but get picked off one at a time.
Survivors win with everyone but they need to look out for themselves. People are petty and if I hurt their chances to win then they'll remove mine.