Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
because youre no longer in defensive stance
- 15 DV naked
- 13 DV in aggressive stance
- 15 DV in defensive stance
And what abiut the -2 hit, does it stack with the -2 DV or is the explanation outdated ?
same with 13 dv with aggressive because youre not in defensive anymore,
are you mentally challenged?
Makes me want to dip into Long Blades just to pick up the +1 PV. Because you can never have too much PV. Recently found some Helping Hands and have been considering going that route anyway to get access to Swipe.
Nope.
This is not an acceptable way to treat someone in reasonable conversation. Please be respectful to others.
What a duch BaronBrixious, calling people retarded and telling complete ♥♥♥♥ what's the point : D?
I don't know if -2 to hit chance is a lot, but I don't see any difference using aggressive stance.
I bet the explanation is just false and only -2 DV apply.
that's how it's always worked for me, and to my knowledge how it's supposed to work. Something might be messed up/bugged with your character if you're convinced it's not working that way. Try making a new character as a Warden (as they start with proficiency) and see how it works for them?
As I said everything is fine now, what I'm talking about is the description of the "Long Blade Proficiency" skill in the "Buy Skills and Powers" screen.
It mentions "-2 to hit" in aggressive stance.
I wonder if it's just a typo instead of "-2DV" or if it's stack with the DV malus.