Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
2. fnaf 2 is a prequel
3.how on earth would mangle be a baby
4. you never see the bite of 87 happen,
5. foxy's jaw was unhindged because they were worried it would happen again.
check all facts next time you try and make a theory like this
That means nothing, there's no proof it was Mike that complained, in fact, there's proof against it. Phone Guy said that the former night guard finished his week and was switched to the day shift at the same location, and obviously Freddy Fazbear's Pizza in FNaF 1 and FNaF 2 are very different.
There are mountains of evidence supporting FNaF 2 being a prequel. For example, in FNaF 1, Phone Guy says that there WAS the bite of 1987, and he never mentions it in FNaF 2. It's also certain that FNaF 2 takes place in 1987 due to the date on the paycheck you recieve after night 5. Sorry but you lose here.
if shes a boy, why is she on ladies night like wolfspartan said and if shes a boy, why does she wear lipstick
the reason he is on ladies night out is because
1 its a joke
2 they need another animatronic besides chica (toy also)
also its comfirmed by scott
i know tons of boy actors who wear make up, none of them wear lipstick
Second, how the **** is Mangle a baby?
Third, you never see the Bite happen. It's implied it occured on Day 7.
Fourth, the guard that complained about animatronics was not Mike Schmidt.
Finally, Foxy's jaw is broken due to the possibility that he was not properly restored, like the other 3.
Theories still need some good research behind them. I guess that I can now make a theory that states the sun is flat and go around presenting and advocating it, and when people begin telling me it's not, I can just claim that it was merely a theory and not supposed to be correct.