安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
讨论规则及指引
举报此帖
Also, again, paycheck. Phone Guy also mentions things like a "yellow suit" being used for something and a birthday in his final call, implying that the murders and the Bite of '87 are happening literally days after Night Five.
And, also, more importantly, Phone Guy's alive. Sure, sure, that could be passed off as the clock rolling over to 6 A.M. literally seconds before Phone Guy gets killed, but he also seems much more skeptical of the animatronics' whole kill-happyness, and there is no way in hell he would take the job again.
Also, the animatronics move around in this one. They are explicitly stated as having used to move around during the day in the first game.
Also, I say also a lot.
That said, yeah, unless you are literally completely ignorant of Night 6 and don't think to, you know, think through everything, you can see there is literally no way in hell this game is a sequel.
Before you start raging, please get you're facts straight. There are at least 100 people on here who know everything FNaF, plus a little extra, so don't try to speak against the community.
Following the last part of my previous comment, this guy is one of those hundred. Attentive, collective and imformative.
He says it has a negative reputation due to the old animatronics being poor prototypes of what one could call 'professional' animatronics. They also removed the generator for the same reason they had less rooms in the newer building; the manager had a lower budget, and couldn't afford much more. This is also why they re-modeled the old ones, to save money. Anyway, why would they change them just to scrap them (e.g: Chica's freaking jaws)?
It seems that us 'children' are more informed than you.
This is why in FNaF1 the parents reported seeing the blood and mucus from the animatronics - the bodies didn't fit, and so the bodily fluids are being forced out.
PROOF: Ok so the animatronics in FNAF1 are repaired and when we go to FNAF2 the animatronics are discarded and old looking and broken. When we go to FNAF3 we will soon see how the place started. If you read this backwards then It's a prequel
Yeah, and ghosts just haunt animatronic animals and walk around killing people by stuffing them into suits all the time. The game is completely realistic other than the facial recognition!
My evidence to prove this:
Firstly, the old characters look nothing like themselves from the first game. Why would you make animatronics look uglier in an attempt to fix them? The old ones in the second game are blockier, with sunken eyes and more dangerous and un-kid friendly parts to them. This suggests that the design was rather rocky at first. Then there were the toy models, which were quite advanced with their new programs like facial recognition, access into criminal databases. Someone here says it's advanced for the 80's? Well if you have enough money, people will make sure that something happens, in this case, the creation of such technological advances. After the incidents, the resturaunt gets shut down, and re-opened in a smaller (both size and budget) version. This place remakes them into rounder, more friendly animatronics without the expensive shine that the toy models recieved. This also makes it so that the building has limited power at night (the resturaunt has to save money, right?).
Secondly, the date on the paycheck is 1987. Need we say more? I doubt Scott would date it that way just to mess with the fans minds. Seriously, the animatronics do that for him.
Thirdly, just saying, I have a feeling that Scott purposely designed FNAF 2 to look like both a prequel and a sequel just to get us fans thinking. For instance, the Phone guy mentions that there are no doors for you to close, which is probably referring to the first game, which makes it seem like a sequel. But there is also the fact that in the first game on night 4, we overhear the Phone guy's demise on his call, yet here he is in FNAF 2, alive and giving you information on the new diner. He wasn't magically raised from the dead to fit a single purpose of giving you information. This makes FNAF 2 seem like a prequel.
Now please, if you have read this, take a break and nom on some cookies. Let this information sink in. Reply only if you have sturdy evidence to go against what I have just written.