FNAF 2 IS A PREQUEL!

[Inzaine]

Okay, for all you people about to rage in the comments, read this.

1. The paycheck date states 11/12/1987 which clearly means Fnaf 2 happened around the Bite Of '87 and if it was mentioned in Fnaf then it HAS to be a prequel otherwise the Phone guy is a time traveling maniac.

2. The phone guy in fnaf 2 mentions about the "smell" of the animatronics (old) like in Fnaf which clearly means the 5 children murdered happened within the "Fredbear's Family Diner" time which I will talk about now.

3. The name of the "first" place was Fredbear's family diner. But in fnaf it is clearly stated as "Freddy Fazbear's Pizza".

Okay, now here's a chronological order of the fnaf series explaining.

First there was Fredbear's Family Diner, which featured the animatronics from fnaf 1. But due to the five children murdered, the place was shut down. It was then reopened (fnaf 2) and the animatronics were redesigned to be more kid friendly, but was then again shut down due to the Bite of '87. In the 6th night newspaper it states that the company will keep the first animatronics which will be redesigned one day for a new place. That place is the first game. They were rebuilt, and then came to the first game.

AND THERE! Hopefully that convinces you that Fnaf 2 is a prequel to fnaf.

[IceWolf]

HNGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH THANK YOU FOR SPELLING PREQUEL RIGHT

[Vally]

As an overly firm believer in FNAF 2 not being Prequel, I'll keep my rant to myself, but I find that the cheque date could've easily been a misprinted date (Or a haunted date since 1987 is an infamous date in the FNAF universe) as the Restaraunt was on imminent shutdown, and the management was hasty to get out all paycheques to employees.

Anyway, I firmly believe FNAF 2 is a sequel, and I'd still follow that point if Scott was to confirm it was a prequel.

[Fatcat]

only thing i have seen is Chickas mouth is Very different

[Jahaga]

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Bonnie the Lagomorph:

As an overly firm believer in FNAF 2 not being Prequel, I'll keep my rant to myself, but I find that the cheque date could've easily been a misprinted date (Or a haunted date since 1987 is an infamous date in the FNAF universe) as the Restaraunt was on imminent shutdown, and the management was hasty to get out all paycheques to employees.

Anyway, I firmly believe FNAF 2 is a sequel, and I'd still follow that point if Scott was to confirm it was a prequel.

There's loads of proof that shows the game is clearly a prequel. Even if Scott himself admits it's a prequel, you will refuse to believe it is? You're either stubborn or stupid.

[Mister Advocat]

There is also there is less money on your pay check implying minimum wage was lower during the second game than the first. The animatronics being able to walk around during the day being a new and 'neat' feature.
At the end in the news clipping the new animatronics end up being scrapped, but the old ones are kept to hopefully be fixed up and used at a smaller location even on a much smaller budget.
The 6th night seems to imply your character gets bitten by the mangled during the birthday party which would be the bite of '87.

Also I have to agree with the first commenter, THANK YOU FOR SPELLING REQUEL RIGHT! I find the much more important question with this game to be 'what the ♥♥♥♥ is up with the marionette'? Seriously, there is something sinister about that thing. The next game will hopefully give light to that. XD

[Soups]

i personally dont think it is a prequal because 1) phone guy said that the NEW freddy fazbears pizza has no doors for you to close 2) the older animatronics are broken and phone guy said foxy was always a bit twitchy(thats why he was out of order before) 3)why are the cutscenes from the future and if the new animatronics were scrapped why is the mariannette there

[Soups]

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από TGS Jahaga:

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Bonnie the Lagomorph:

As an overly firm believer in FNAF 2 not being Prequel, I'll keep my rant to myself, but I find that the cheque date could've easily been a misprinted date (Or a haunted date since 1987 is an infamous date in the FNAF universe) as the Restaraunt was on imminent shutdown, and the management was hasty to get out all paycheques to employees.

Anyway, I firmly believe FNAF 2 is a sequel, and I'd still follow that point if Scott was to confirm it was a prequel.

There's loads of proof that shows the game is clearly a prequel. Even if Scott himself admits it's a prequel, you will refuse to believe it is? You're either stubborn or stupid.

no he hasnt plus the poster in fnaf 2 say my day at the NEW freddys pizzaria and in fnaf 1 it doesnt

[Fatcat]

but maybe its the sacond game of three 1.We don't now 2. Five nights at Freddy 2 3. Five nights at Freddy's 1

[Mister Advocat]

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από mobutt03:

no he hasnt plus the poster in fnaf 2 say my day at the NEW freddys pizzaria and in fnaf 1 it doesnt

That only implys the establishment wasn't new when you were hired in the first Fnaf game, it does not imply that it came before the first Fnaf game.
So really that isn't something that can be used one way or the other I mean look at 'The NEW super mario bros'! That game is actually pretty old now.

[Inzaine]

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από mobutt03:

i personally dont think it is a prequal because 1) phone guy said that the NEW freddy fazbears pizza has no doors for you to close 2) the older animatronics are broken and phone guy said foxy was always a bit twitchy(thats why he was out of order before) 3)why are the cutscenes from the future and if the new animatronics were scrapped why is the mariannette there

I don't think you read what I said, there was a pizzeria BEFORE the 2nd one.

[Inzaine]

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Bonnie the Lagomorph:

As an overly firm believer in FNAF 2 not being Prequel, I'll keep my rant to myself, but I find that the cheque date could've easily been a misprinted date (Or a haunted date since 1987 is an infamous date in the FNAF universe) as the Restaraunt was on imminent shutdown, and the management was hasty to get out all paycheques to employees.

Anyway, I firmly believe FNAF 2 is a sequel, and I'd still follow that point if Scott was to confirm it was a prequel.

You believe what you believe.

[Blaze]

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Bonnie the Lagomorph:

As an overly firm believer in FNAF 2 not being Prequel, I'll keep my rant to myself, but I find that the cheque date could've easily been a misprinted date (Or a haunted date since 1987 is an infamous date in the FNAF universe) as the Restaraunt was on imminent shutdown, and the management was hasty to get out all paycheques to employees.

Anyway, I firmly believe FNAF 2 is a sequel, and I'd still follow that point if Scott was to confirm it was a prequel.

Minimum wage matches up perfectly with the amount you're paid in 1987. Paying any less any later would be illegal and the job could not have been advertised like that. Why would the amount your payed match up perfectly like that if 1987 is a misprint. If 1987 is wrong for some reason, then the amount your paid must also be wrong, so basically what you're saying is the entire check is not correct.

So either the check is correct and lines up with the other evidence that says it's a prequel, or the entire check is written wrong for some unknown reason, and just so happens to line up with all the other evidence that says it's a prequel.

Basically what you said makes no sense.

[Enrico Dandolo]

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από DFS Inzaine:

Okay, for all you people about to rage in the comments, read this.

1. The paycheck date states 11/12/1987 which clearly means Fnaf 2 happened around the Bite Of '87 and if it was mentioned in Fnaf then it HAS to be a prequel otherwise the Phone guy is a time traveling maniac.

2. The phone guy in fnaf 2 mentions about the "smell" of the animatronics (old) like in Fnaf which clearly means the 5 children murdered happened within the "Fredbear's Family Diner" time which I will talk about now.

3. The name of the "first" place was Fredbear's family diner. But in fnaf it is clearly stated as "Freddy Fazbear's Pizza".

Okay, now here's a chronological order of the fnaf series explaining.

First there was Fredbear's Family Diner, which featured the animatronics from fnaf 1. But due to the five children murdered, the place was shut down. It was then reopened (fnaf 2) and the animatronics were redesigned to be more kid friendly, but was then again shut down due to the Bite of '87. In the 6th night newspaper it states that the company will keep the first animatronics which will be redesigned one day for a new place. That place is the first game. They were rebuilt, and then came to the first game.

AND THERE! Hopefully that convinces you that Fnaf 2 is a prequel to fnaf.

nope fnaf is 999999999% a sequal not prequel i can tell because the bite of 87 happen the old amatronics cant roam in the day but the new amatronics can because they didnt mention about the bite of 87 and when u press new game it says grand reopening that means fnaf2 is a sequal

[❖Carnage]

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από ilhanlikesdinosaurs:

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από DFS Inzaine:

-snip-

nope fnaf is 999999999% a sequal not prequel i can tell because the bite of 87 happen the old amatronics cant roam in the day but the new amatronics can because they didnt mention about the bite of 87 and when u press new game it says grand reopening that means fnaf2 is a sequal

FNAF 2 is a prequel. They were allowed to roam during the day in FNAF 2 as the bite of 87' has yet to occur. Both weren't allowed to roam during the day but they had to sell the new ones due to them costing a lot for maintenance and due to the fact that they were bankrupt. Grand Reopening of the restaurant as a FRANCHISE because there was a restaurant before it which is Fredbear's Diner which was closed for some reason.

[Vally]

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από TGS Jahaga:

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Bonnie the Lagomorph:

As an overly firm believer in FNAF 2 not being Prequel, I'll keep my rant to myself, but I find that the cheque date could've easily been a misprinted date (Or a haunted date since 1987 is an infamous date in the FNAF universe) as the Restaraunt was on imminent shutdown, and the management was hasty to get out all paycheques to employees.

Anyway, I firmly believe FNAF 2 is a sequel, and I'd still follow that point if Scott was to confirm it was a prequel.

There's loads of proof that shows the game is clearly a prequel. Even if Scott himself admits it's a prequel, you will refuse to believe it is? You're either stubborn or stupid.

Stupid and damn proud of it. ^^