Zainstaluj Steam
zaloguj się
|
język
简体中文 (chiński uproszczony)
繁體中文 (chiński tradycyjny)
日本語 (japoński)
한국어 (koreański)
ไทย (tajski)
български (bułgarski)
Čeština (czeski)
Dansk (duński)
Deutsch (niemiecki)
English (angielski)
Español – España (hiszpański)
Español – Latinoamérica (hiszpański latynoamerykański)
Ελληνικά (grecki)
Français (francuski)
Italiano (włoski)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonezyjski)
Magyar (węgierski)
Nederlands (niderlandzki)
Norsk (norweski)
Português (portugalski – Portugalia)
Português – Brasil (portugalski brazylijski)
Română (rumuński)
Русский (rosyjski)
Suomi (fiński)
Svenska (szwedzki)
Türkçe (turecki)
Tiếng Việt (wietnamski)
Українська (ukraiński)
Zgłoś problem z tłumaczeniem
Do does Whitehills, but apparently they can pull soldiers out of thin air and properly arm them despitethe fact that they dont have ironwood and should be much poorer house than Forresters.
Haha, THAT'S your comeback? That's funny. I respect people's opinions on the game, but when people like you lurk around here and only proceed to ♥♥♥♥♥ about it, that's when it gets annoying. If you don't like it, don't play it. I don't go to game forums for games I don't like and ♥♥♥♥♥ about them constantly, I just don't play them. Problem solved.
How is respecting someone's opinion amount to you calling them a whiner and a ♥♥♥♥♥? Others refuted my opinion with one of their own, you just made derogatory remarks about me. This is not a forum for those that have only positive views of the game. Since when do I need your permission to state my opinion on something...Get over yourself, I have a right to be here same as you.
Did you read what I put? I said when people like you constantly whine and ♥♥♥♥♥ about the game, it gets annoying. And using your logic, I have a right to say whatever I want to you about your opinions.
As opposed to being a fanboy of the game? You defined the calibur of person you were the instant you insulted me and did not just dispute the statement with one of your own. You trapse around the forum defending the game on every post and then criticize me for doing the same. You are a hypocrite. There I have lowered myself to your level by name calling (after much provocation).
Except the Whitelhills are on the side of the Boltons, so it is very likely that they didn't lose any soldiers at the Red Wedding, while the Forresters lots many soldiers.
Except I don't constantly defend the game. I've given some criticism about it on here (which is different than what you've been doing so far). You haven't even been on here that long and you're trying to make generalizations about me? Okay, kid.
Yeah, that's pretty much the truth,.
It's canon for the show, mostly. While the Forresters are mentinoned in the books, the game is clearly set in the show canon.
Yeah, that's pretty much the truth,. [/quote]
And concidering how concern you guys are on the "Canon" of the franchise, how would you make a good GoT game without making it non-canon?
This Forrester storyline is the best thing Telltale could do. The lore of ASOIAF is too detailed for them to center the game on major events without it constricting they creative abilities.
I would set it in the Blackfyre rebellion, for example, and it's aftermath, and I would involve several houses which are completely fictional and made from the scratch, and they won't happen to enter in contact with Kings, Queens, Wardens, etc.
I liked "The Sworn Sword", I wonder how an incident like that would play in a videogame. And just as it involved absolutely minor houses, you could involve your own small minor houses and thus make irrelevant who survives or who doesn't, even allowing multiple endings (because in the 100 years from that moment on, any or both of those houses may become extinct just by, say, marrying their last female heir to a male heir of another house). This way you could explain why nobody mentioned them in GoT: Either they are simple one not important enough to have played a major role, or they don't exist anymore for whatever the reason.
But people wouldn't like intrigue, combat, machiavellism and personal relations unless those occur surrounding Maergery, Tyrion, Cersei, Bolton, Danaerys, etc.
It's a wonder Eddard hasn't been revived yet just by popular acclaim.