Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Just one question:
the source footage\images need to be 21:9
Don't want to inadveranly crop 16:9 footage .
where is the 21:9 source footage going to come from ?
( Don't want left\right black bars either )
please give us more info .
I made a video of 15 minutes (60fps 2560x1080) and it took 1 hour 15 minutes to process
you think is a good time for the render in this resolution ?
1. Zooming in to make it 21:9, but loosing video on top and bottom.
2. Stretch the image wider by turning off "Maintain Aspect Ratio" in crop settings.
3. Do nothing, and have black bars on the sides.
As for finding source footage, well, that depends. What are you trying to make a movie of? There are alot of movies that are actual filmed in cinimatic 21:9 already. I personaly use my own footage I capture in my games at 3440x1440 60fps using NVIDIA Shadowplay.
Sorry for the late reply. Hope this helps.
i did find that
64/27 is defacto at 2.37037 repeating , 2560 x 1080
21/9 is 2.3333 repeating , 2520 x 1080
i have seen DVD movie jackets say : 2.35 Ulta Wide Cinema Scope .
monitors don't always use 2560 x 1080 .
and you use 3440 x 1440 ,...
i guess if the apsect is close to 21:9 , theeeennnnn it's ok.
i like your 1. option the best .
Thanks for your help buddy!