Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chino tradicional)
日本語 (Japonés)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandés)
български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Checo)
Dansk (Danés)
Deutsch (Alemán)
English (Inglés)
Español - España
Ελληνικά (Griego)
Français (Francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandés)
Norsk (Noruego)
Polski (Polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portugués - Brasil)
Română (Rumano)
Русский (Ruso)
Suomi (Finés)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Informar de un error de traducción
Este tema ha sido cerrado 
Normas y directrices sobre discusión
8 
Denunciar este mensaje
This is how the left and right wings of America work. They're both the same bird and they both want to censor the content you consume due to their own personal values.
You're ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ right. And don't you forget it, buddy.
Dude, there's about five thousand of those. None of us take it seriously. Also the feds? I know several of them. They're honestly worried about real traffickers and terrorists rather than what is on someone's PC. And nope, I'm clean as far as what you'd think I have. Hell, you can check the PC yourself. After you've seen the thirty thousandth female bodybuilder, you'd be like okay, I'm done with this. How can guys even like women that muscular? 😆
1. Steam is packed with teenagers who are no doubt consuming pornographic content, including this game. Age is relevant. The study concludes that violent pornography is a likely risk factor for youth male on female sexual violence. Considering that the subject is unrehearsed, inconclusive information is acceptable as few alternative anchors of information exist.
2. Humans are incredibly malleable and subversive concepts spread mimetically through media consumption. Shouldn't have to explain this one.
3. The study found that increased exposure to pornography was linked to increased aggression and hostility to women, and leans heavily into sexual script and cultivation theory. Furthermore, data helps paint a complete picture and should not be disregarded.
4. Considering that minors are likely playing this game, and that an entire generation has already grown up on the internet with access to pornography, this article is relevant. Here's a snippet: "In the physical violence model, being a member of the Seekers class (those who intentionally sought out pornography and sex chatting), especially for participants who were maltreated, predicted having had more violent romantic partners one year later".
Here's the correct link. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7135936/
That doesn't mean I'm going to let you control me. I come from the generation of GWAR, Type O Negative, Limp Bizkit & Korn, Slipknot, Manson, Eminem, Dope (who famously released the hit of my teenage years,"Die MF Die") which was in itself a song about rebelling against the people who used their moral and social high horses to push you back. The generation that brought us South Park and Beavis and Butthead, etc. That was my generation. So I'm going to fight for this no matter how stupid this game is to me. Because as some have said, if we give you an inch, you take a mile. It won't end with this game. You'll go after others. I know your type.
And you know what? Your little piece on teenagers is just a way to get your foot in the door so you can ban all "coomer games" as you call them. You don't think anyone is going to fight back. Well, we degenerates certainly will. Because we get the difference between fantasy and reality. People can still smoke, still drink and both are harmful. Spare me your porn stats, I've heard every single one you can think of. People who smoke and drink know it's bad for them. Doesn't stop them from doing it and neither are you a god of that authority to make them stop, so please sit down.
Your mind is not the steel helm you think it is, friend. Music and movies can influence a mind, but not to the degree that pornography can. Sex is a coveted, innate biological imperative. It is easily warped and exploited.
While your generation made important strides in freedom, to which we're all thankful, not all your "freedoms" are virtues. Ironically, it's your generation's moral lassitude that has created such a fragmented, ♥♥♥♥♥♥ up society. The insane polarity of the left and right is a direct response to you and people like you.
But I will not box you in, nor refer to you as any particular "kind", and hope you will come to a sense of morality that is not dependent on popular bureaucratic law. I doubt you are a hapless, amoral sex-charged automaton. I have nothing else to say.
https://youtu.be/K3jXXsL0q5A?si=IlM16Qq6QvV4Jj1j
That's completely false. The society was always effed up. It didn't matter what the era. Stag films were crazy. The Grand Guignol was horrific. The only difference is we have the internet. And did you only pick Beneath The Remains because it is having an anniversary right now and probably comes up easily when you type metal in a Google search? 🤔 I used to work with these musicians, mate. I'm a former music journalist and former death metal vocalist. The polarization is not a response to me, it's a result of social media, directly. All these viewpoints existed before the internet and before social media. On both the left and right. Whew, listen to some old Ministry and you'll hear classic left wing takes.
I love when someone from Gen Z tells me that they understand what it was like in the nineties. There was a massive evangelical movement back then and we rebelled against that. That was your right wing "we gotta ban porn, metal and D&D because of the kids" and it was all silly. This is just an extension of that.
2. Malleable, but capable of critical thinking and self-regulation. 'You are not immune to propaganda' does not mean the same thing as 'mere exposure will force you to accept a position or adopt a belief'.
There is also the issue that depiction is not automatically endorsement, I brought this up in a different thread but there is a qualitative difference between works that are actively looking to convince you to change your values or accept a position and works that don't. People who are engaged in taboo kinks are generally very much aware that this stuff is objectively bad IRL and should remain the domain of fiction.
3. I did not disregard it, I clarified its implications. The variability of these types of studies and especially the extent to which demographics has an impact on outcomes suggests that the results of this study are likely tied to cultural factors, specifically it supports the notion that men under patriarchal society continue to have a major problem with understanding and respecting consent.
That is not a problem inherent to the porn itself but rather an issue rooted deeply in the core of that patriarchal society, the men who show increased aggression in response to porn are very likely inherently dangerous with or without it, and need to be addressed directly, not by screwing over everyone else who can engage with it without problem.
And don't forget that censorship is a blunt instrument and that these exact kinds of dangerous men are disproportionately represented in positions of power, I certainly don't think that handing them powerful tools to control society with is going to achieve the outcome you expect. You think you're going to stop rape culture, but the more likely outcome is that anyone who isn't a cishet, vanilla-abiding conservative winds up being censored right off the internet and into a jail cell under the guise of purging "degeneracy" from society.
4. This is concerned with the *victims'* usage of pornography, not their partners, and while it speculates about whether the porn itself might shape their risk profile it does not establish any sort of hard causal link.
Additionally, I would encourage you to read pages 12 and 13 more closely. The high sexual objectification group's risk profile is mitigated for those who exhibit higher sexual assertiveness (note that this is *not* intended as victim blaming) implying that objectification in of itself isn't necessarily the driving factor. It's a rather complicated paper that's drawing some very nuanced conclusions, I don't think it can be used to support "Porn = Inherent driver of abuse" or any narrative really other than that more research into these higher risk groups is needed.
As a parting comment, I would remind you that porn existed prior to the internet and misogyny prior to the existence of porn itself. You can't explain millennia of patriarchal society in terms of people being brainwashed by porn into becoming misogynistic rapists, the roots of the power structure are far deeper than that.