Installera Steam
logga in
|
språk
简体中文 (förenklad kinesiska)
繁體中文 (traditionell kinesiska)
日本語 (japanska)
한국어 (koreanska)
ไทย (thailändska)
Български (bulgariska)
Čeština (tjeckiska)
Dansk (danska)
Deutsch (tyska)
English (engelska)
Español - España (Spanska - Spanien)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanska - Latinamerika)
Ελληνικά (grekiska)
Français (franska)
Italiano (italienska)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesiska)
Magyar (ungerska)
Nederlands (nederländska)
Norsk (norska)
Polski (polska)
Português (Portugisiska – Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portugisiska - Brasilien)
Română (rumänska)
Русский (ryska)
Suomi (finska)
Türkçe (turkiska)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamesiska)
Українська (Ukrainska)
Rapportera problem med översättningen
Alright, bro. So let me explain this to you since you're totally clueless. The demographic for these games is about 30/40+ and even the Japanese ones are going up to 27+ so it's mainly a lot of older guys that play these. If you don't like these games, that's fine - but adult fantasy game =/= real world relationships. Just like Jason slashing people isn't equal to real mass murder. And I have a sinking feeling that the reason why a lot of guys like the mommy dommy stuff so much is because the mommy characters are actually their own ages. Especially the AVN market. Now with hentai games that's a younger market but you get fights between the hentai people because they think the AVN models look like old ladies and the AVN people think the hentai characters look like kids. Hence why they prefer the older looking characters and those are very popular.
A lot of the guys that play these are in fact, married. Yep. I know the guys in one server go out to the bars all the time and post their pints as they talk about stuff like sports and movies, popular celebrity women, all that old men talk. Some of these guys couldn't even be bothered with the anime stuff. Want nothing to do with it. Oh and the guys who make a lot of these are married too. The wife often gives her support. I dunno anything about this dev though, but those I've met have been cool, down to earth guys and gals for the most part. It's fantasy. No man around here is walking around with like eight women in a harem. That sounds like a headache to me. I'm forty years old and I can tell you all about that haha.
Don't knock the hobby. I'm not gonna knock that new whack ass anime ya'll kids are into. Shonen ain't been good since Fist Of The North Star. But I respect what ya'll like. Ain't none of the older folks buying this are interested in throwing their old ladies around. Let's think with some sense. Just like the ladies that play the torture and drugging men games aren't going to do that in real life either. People have some pretty crazy fetishes, but we're also able to know right from wrong. I might like to browse the horror section, but I'm not about to try to be Jason.
I get it, this one's too much for a lot of people. Cool. But that doesn't mean we knock the whole genre. I mean, damn. It ain't that real.
That is why this hasn't been locked down.
I love when people pull this out of their asses. I've seen plenty of the violent stuff, but never in my life would I ever and have I ever tried to harm a woman sexually. I'm not into that and fiction is absolutely not real life. Real life sex is strictly consensual, especially if it gets a bit rough. Safe words were invented for a reason.
"I'm not..."
"I wouldn't..."
"I'd never..."
Anecdotal experience does not supersede reality.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6751001/#:~:text=Boys%20exposed%20to%20violent%20pornography,to%20their%20non-exposed%20counterparts.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20980228/
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257931662_Pornography_and_Sexist_Attitudes_Among_Heterosexuals
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30778831/
Here's another game for them to get all worked up over.
Is legality truly your litmus test for what's right and wrong? I doubt it. You said it yourself - you don't give a ♥♥♥♥. Just say that and move on. Stop pretending to posit some kind of moral high ground.
The first revolves around teenagers (who shouldn't be consuming this content in the first place) and concludes that their research doesn't establish a causal link as shown in the limitations section.
The second looks to be straight up irrelevant. I don't have access to the full article (and I suspect that you don't either) but based on the abstract It's an analysis of the scenarios depicted in porn, it literally says nothing about the people consuming it.
The third is about a specific population of danish cishet men and is complicated by the fact that these types of studies have shown a wide range of results especially when examining populations outside of men. It's a data point, but not a conclusion. It also appears to be about porn in general, not specific types of content.
The fourth doesn't appear to be relevant either? I don't have time to read it in depth but it appears to be a study of youth sexuality that attempts to understand what if any relationship there is between their online habits and the likelihood of adverse outcomes.
If you want to push the narrative that a specific type of content will magically brainwash people into becoming rapists or that it could only ever be enjoyed by someone who is already a rapist, then you might want to actually find research that supports your position instead of hoping that no one will check the articles you're spamming.
You're a grade A degenerate.