Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Anyway, Lost World had the same flaws of Sonic Unleashed (having a different gameplay without a good level design) but at least the day stages saved some of it.
Lost World, aside from iconic levels such as Honeycomb Highway or Sea Bottom Segue, has not day stage equivalent with a better gameplay...
Anyway yes the game is bad (well, less than Sonic 2006 or Shadow the Edge at least).
They should've ported Colors instead.
https://amp.reddit.com/r/virginvschad/comments/b4ig1l/the_virgin_fortnite_vs_the_chad_unreal_im/
Like Peter Venkman Bill Murray once said in Ghostbusters 2 "cats and dogs living together mass histeria...etc.
First of all: stfu
Second of all: macaroni and cheese doesn't look nor smell bad
Third of all: I AM MAKING MAC AND CHEESE, AND NOBODY CAN STOP ME!!! (this is a link)
I don't need to have played it to know the overall quality of the product, and I most likely don't want to either. Life's too short to waste on terrible/mediocre games, especially when there's a lot of truly great stuff out there for me to experience instead.
That's why previews, trailers and screenshots exist, to give us an idea on what a particular game is like before we buy them.
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2445083143
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2429139965
Also what may be pleasing for some may be bad for others because of taste (or because of what someone is used to, so even despite "better quality 3D and textures", if the game dont follow the formula a player want to see this player will not enjoy it, or find it good, despite the better quality graphics).
That is also a matter of "design" where some stuff are made with the purpose of looking dated (like something straight out of the early 90s) like Celeste . . . Sonic Mania, Mario Maker (for the most part of it) .... and all imo still good games despite graphics and presentation being dated for today standards.
To me, looks and story comes second or third (less in case it is an RPG, then story must come first but if gameplay is terrible I dont know if I would force myself to play through it even if the story is awesome).
As a side note, I saw the reveals of both Sonic Mania and Sonic Forces at around the same time - of the two, I only found Sonic Mania to look interesting in the slightest. Despite Forces having better graphics, Forces failed to grab my attention the same way Mania did, not because it's new and new things scare me, but because they threw in classic Sonic and had so much classic imagery where it didn't belong despite the fact that we already had Mania for that classic nostalgia experience.
That's why I don't even care about the graphics of a game either, because Forces had bar none the best graphics in the series yet is also one of the worst looking Sonic games to date. And it's not because it's not 16/32 bit pixel art - I think Sonic Unleashed is an amazing looking game on the PS3/360 and easily the best looking game in the series, and due to its fantastic art direction, it can hold its own against other games in the genre and grab my attention just by looking at screenshots and trailers the same way Mania did.
What is good and what is awful depend on taste and expectancy.
(also Lost World is still better than Adventure 2)