Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Thats how I feel about Sifu. Despite being a gamer who was around during the 80s Ninja Gaiden and sequels, I never got into them but am looking to perhaps purchase this one. Is it a lot more difficult than games like sifu?
It's a pretty difficult game, but there are easy difficulties. The better you get at the game mechanically, you will wan't to increase those. Certain weapons can make the game easier as well.
My viewpoint is that thare are different "schools" within action genre.
One is represented by Devil May Cry, Bayonetta and the likes. In those games focus is on doing stylish combos, using different things etc. etc. Those are more about "making an effect".
Now, there is also totally other thing. Which is most notably seen in Ninja Gaiden (though I'd also include Shinobi/Nightshade as well). In those games, its all about quick and tight disposal of enemies. So it's about "being efficient".
Granted, you can always try opposite in each, but that's how are view the genealogy of these games.
That being said, I totally agree about the feel that NG gives, in terms of combat. It's the most... elastic? combat in games I ever played. It just feels specially (even though I enjoy many other games too).
It's a beat em all, slower than DMC or Bayonetta though.
But it currently has lots of performance issues.