Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
That said, with certain setups you can actually just let the corruption stick around while surviving as long as you care to keep playing a region.
If that's the case, I was wondering if it was more beneficial in the long term to beat back the corruption as much as possible, or to "allow it" to grow anywhere on the map that I don't currently need access to? Back in the day, it was kind of a double edged sword deal where you basically choose between a huge but relatively weak enemy camp or a tiny but incredibly powerful camp
If I may interject, the only reason you'd allow it to grow is to farm the random drops or god XP, but you can do the latter easier by starvation ranching some of your population. I don't know what your goals in-game are, but if it's to clean out every region, you're better off stopping the enemy scaling as soon as possible.