DRAGON BALL XENOVERSE

DRAGON BALL XENOVERSE

Ciciro 2015 年 3 月 2 日 下午 7:33
So what exactly is canon for Dragon Ball?
I was always of the opinion that if it was not in the original manga, then it was not canon. Is this the correct line of thinking or not?
< >
正在显示第 31 - 45 条,共 170 条留言
TheMetalCorpser 2015 年 3 月 3 日 上午 8:02 
引用自 cowbell
He did state what is canon and it is contradictory.
What do you mean?
Ramza 2015 年 3 月 3 日 上午 8:02 
canon for me ends with cell saga but everyone has there own opinion
cowbell 2015 年 3 月 3 日 上午 8:07 
引用自 UnbornCorpser
引用自 cowbell
He did state what is canon and it is contradictory.
What do you mean?
Check my earlier posts.
Bass 2015 年 3 月 3 日 上午 8:22 
any work created or accepted to be part of the canon by the original author is canon to me.
Steven Chilton 2015 年 3 月 3 日 上午 8:26 
引用自 Ciciro
I was always of the opinion that if it was not in the original manga, then it was not canon. Is this the correct line of thinking or not?
Basically whatever toriyama says is canon
Dbzbog is canon and since it mentions vegeta's brother vegeta's brother is also canon
i don't know if in the new movie broly is in but if it brings any old enemies it makes them canon just not their movie
cowbell 2015 年 3 月 3 日 上午 8:36 
Kind of defeats the feeling of being a survivor of a dead race if new people keep showing up.
TheMetalCorpser 2015 年 3 月 3 日 上午 9:32 
引用自 cowbell
Kind of defeats the feeling of being a survivor of a dead race if new people keep showing up.
You mean the saiyans?
2Dement3D 2015 年 3 月 3 日 上午 9:47 
The way I see it, if Akira Toriyama had a hand in the development of something, then it should be considered canon, unless he stated otherwise. In terms of GT, he did not write it nor is it based on his work, but he did however have a hand in it's production (coming up with the GT name and even designing some characters), and I think he approves of how that series went, so I'm sorta stuck between whether it's canon or not.
Spirit of Bardock 2015 年 3 月 3 日 上午 10:07 
引用自 2Dement3D
The way I see it, if Akira Toriyama had a hand in the development of something, then it should be considered canon, unless he stated otherwise. In terms of GT, he did not write it nor is it based on his work, but he did however have a hand in it's production (coming up with the GT name and even designing some characters), and I think he approves of how that series went, so I'm sorta stuck between whether it's canon or not.

it is canon, it's just in a different universe.
TheMetalCorpser 2015 年 3 月 3 日 上午 10:11 
引用自 Spirit of Bardock
it is canon, it's just in a different universe.
Time to get a blender and mix 'em all up together so everything is canon'ed into one big universe. :P
zurcareV 2015 年 3 月 3 日 上午 10:20 
引用自 UnbornCorpser
引用自 Spirit of Bardock
it is canon, it's just in a different universe.
Time to get a blender and mix 'em all up together so everything is canon'ed into one big universe. :P

Thats the purpose of Xenoverse and everything it brings. Its to bring it all together within the realm of possible.
最后由 zurcareV 编辑于; 2015 年 3 月 3 日 上午 10:20
Bioshocked 2015 年 3 月 3 日 上午 10:21 
Dragonball doesn't have cannons. Get out of here. :P
TheMetalCorpser 2015 年 3 月 3 日 上午 11:23 
引用自 CanadianGoku

Thats the purpose of Xenoverse and everything it brings. Its to bring it all together within the realm of possible.
Too bad it's missing so many characters and it needs more customization.
Swarna 2015 年 3 月 3 日 上午 11:39 
No such thing as an official canon in Dragon Ball, regardless of what fans will tell you. If you take all of the franchise to be canon there are major issues with consistency and such so you can alternatively consider manga, anime, movies, GT, DBO, etc., to all be their own exclusive universes. I would not mix them together because there are some significant differences between them (e.g. Future Trunks attains Super Saiyan when Gohan dies in the anime but in the manga he was already Super Saiyan at that point, manga heavily implies Gohan/Gotenks is stronger than Goku in the Buu Saga but anime fillers and different dialogue adds implications for Goku being stronger which was never a thing in the manga).
最后由 Swarna 编辑于; 2015 年 3 月 3 日 上午 11:41
NekoiNemo 2015 年 3 月 3 日 上午 11:41 
引用自 Ciciro
I was always of the opinion that if it was not in the original manga, then it was not canon. Is this the correct line of thinking or not?
Official canon - everything (utter bullcrap and contradicts itself in like two dozen occasions), fan canon - only manga stuff and OVA (Ossu! Kaette Kita Son Gokū to Nakama-tachi!!).
最后由 NekoiNemo 编辑于; 2015 年 3 月 3 日 上午 11:44
< >
正在显示第 31 - 45 条,共 170 条留言
每页显示数: 1530 50

发帖日期: 2015 年 3 月 2 日 下午 7:33
回复数: 170