Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Afaik it doesn't need any dead bodies. It works without corpses. But yeah that 20% faster healing is a must have on hither difficulties.
It’s been looked into as an alternative to cremation in the real world and when it was all said and done the negatives out weigh the pros. you can’t just toss a human in a ditch and grow stuff out of you where to nitrogen rich for plants when decomposing yes it’s better than nothing but overall it’s quite a bad forum of conpost so the law should not be good. The reason the law is there is to see if people will take when in need not to be strong. Frost punk is a game of mortality and realism where possible. Having a bad choice give better results than your likly to see in the real world dosent make sense for the game.
To futher that transfer of disease is quite high with human compost and the cost to do it it rather high with having to use sawdust or some other carbon with it to counter the nitrogen to a point to allow plants to grow at even a possible rate. In fact in many tests the soil from human remains was WORSE than soil made with compost from human crap witch in all honesty is prob what is already being used in frost punk as a fertilizer as it’s in surplus and low on plants and other alternatives to give you a nice thought to go out on. So if anything the law shouldent do much as human compost is just not good.
You can always justify bad design by saying it was meant that way because of XY. Whatever, it remains bad design.
As I said, it could be a very interesting law if it was geared toward obtaining food in the early game. Let's say you fail to rush scouts and find some food - how about letting someone die during the emergency shift and turn him into 20 raw food? I can see people using that.
Its not bad design thou. As said people are a bad fertilizer in real life. Making them good fertilizer in the game just because you want it to be is not good design. Making it match your source material the real world is. Esp when the game is trying to maintain realism.
Yes directly eating the person is more effective to get food than trying to grow plants out of them but thats not what the law is doing and would have quite a bit more moral ramifications if found out. Yes organic fert has its own moral ramifications but if people find out your grinding people up into meat paste and feeding them that it would be so much worse.
Adding that as a suggestion for another law is not a bad idea. There is already a law that lets you use corpses are raw food thou.That doesn't make organic fert bad design thou in fast its good design. Bad laws are NOT a bad thing. Just like bad cards (pack filler) in card games are not a bad thing. As said prime example dueling law prob the worst law in the game is still there and designed quite well even no people don't use as its weak vs the cons are to high.
You have not given one reason why org fert is "bad design" other than its weak witch is NOT a reason for bad design. As many things are designed to be that way so long as there is a reason for it that still is good design. Yes it being weak makes it weak witch it is, it dose not make for bad design.