Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
With regard to talking or reading, the overall word count isn't that much lower than Baldur's Gate 1. However, Icewind Dale isn't only more combat-heavy, it is also much more linear. Like you move forward from on area to the next when you're done with the current main quest - and you travel back and forth a bit only when there's a current quest hub, such as the villages Easthaven, Kuldahar or Lonelywood.
What also makes it interesting is the replay value, since by default you MUST create 1-6 characters yourself. You can do that in the Baldur's Gate games, too, with the "Create Party" button, but in IWD it's a strict requirement. There are no story companions. Take the opportunity and play with different teams, experiencing different classes/kits and possibly different strategies & tactics.
Finally, Heart of Winter is integrated into the base game, so you can do expansion content at level 9 onwards while continuing with the base game. Trials of the Luremaster, on the other hand, is integrated into Heart of Winter as another combat-heavy expansion.
I vastly prefer playing IDW due to the combat (which is ass in PT. I can't even figure out how to script my companions to do something besides zerg rush like a sped.) but PT is still as good as I remembered it in the past. Well the writing is much better than I remembered, I was laughing a lot because the dialogue is legit funny which is rare in most crpgs where the writing is typically, unintentionally funny. I recall PT's writing being kinda hokey but I think that's more due to the pretentious fanbase (who swear to you how gud da philosophy is but can't even explain it to you lol.) making that game sound more lame than it actually is. I completely forgot how PT had such a dark horror vibe, with really cool looking horror-influenced characters. Lady of Pain looks like she came straight out of Hellraiser.
As for BG, I find BG1 immensely replayable since nearly the entire game is just free-roaming & killing crap. It's BG2 which constantly forces the (sometimes unskippable) story on to you like some jrpg.
If you like a quick dungeon crawler with a bit story and combat then you will be fine.