Bay or Bae and why

[wizard]

.

[rmsgrey]

Bae - because the game doesn't do enough to sell the idea that the answer to too much time-travel is yet more time travel, because the lesson of accepting the consequences of one's actions starts now, not after choosing to change the consequences yet again, and because taking direct action to knowingly cause someone's death is wrong, even if it's the only way to save thousands.

Bay - because it's Chloe's choice to sacrifice herself, and because thousands of lives outweigh a single life.

[Bilge]

I would say bae because in a situation like that most people would have do the same, and I don’t think I owe anyone the life of someone I love

[Qiana]

Originally posted by rmsgrey:

Originally posted by wizard:

Bay or Bae and why

Bay -

• because it's Chloe's choice to sacrifice herself, and because thousands of lives outweigh a single life.

*If you really love Chloe, and if you are a good friend, then you'd also respect the (last) wish of your (former) BFF.

[Bilge]

Lol, you guys are seriously unhinged. Why don't you get over it and leave me alone? Oh, you can't, right? You guys can't live without drama, I guess. You're literally quoting a finished conversation from another discussion just to create drama. Stop it. Leave me be, get a life

[Bilge]

For the record, that quote isn’t even mine. Not sure why you feel the need to make things up, but please find something better to do with your time

[Qiana]

Originally posted by Bilge:

Originally posted by Bilge:

Originally posted by Bilge:

Originally posted by Bilge:

Originally posted by Bilge:

Lol, you guys are seriously unhinged. Why don't you get over it and leave me alone? Oh, you can't, right? You guys can't live without drama, I guess. You're literally quoting a finished conversation from another discussion just to create drama. Stop it. Leave me be, get a life

This will probably be my last reply here because I’ve already proven that you guys are literally lying about basic stuff [...]

>Pointing the gun at Max and shooting at the bottles in the junkyard is "treating the gun like it's a toy," and it shows just one more time how she needs a therapist, not a gun.

>Practicing headshots on her supposedly BFF, or practicing proving her stupidity?

Lies and misinterpretation again, can't you say anything without lying? Shooting at targets isn’t “playing,” dude, it’s called practice. But yeah, go ahead and keep changing definitions and misinterpreting.

Practicing headshots? Yeah, definitely, because she shot Max in the head like, what [...]

>Then why was she treating the gun like it's a toy and ended up shooting herself? Anyone who wants to defend themselves wouldn't be giggling and playing with a gun while asking your friend to rewind time like it's some toy.

She never treated the gun like a toy.

For the record, that quote isn’t even mine. Not sure why you feel the need to make things up, but please find something better to do with your time

https://steamcommunity.com/app/319630/discussions/0/591770487774801323/?ctp=8#c601904795201159520

https://steamcommunity.com/app/319630/discussions/0/591770487774801323/?ctp=9#c601904971022085020

https://steamcommunity.com/app/319630/discussions/0/591770487774801323/?ctp=10#c591772052728380105

[Bilge]

God, you are so cringe. You're literally pulling random quotes and acting like it proves something. It doesn’t. That’s just desperate. Dude, please stop lying and misinterpreting, and stop hijacking someone else’s topic to create drama

[Qiana]

Originally posted by Bilge:

God, you are so cringe. You're literally pulling random quotes and acting like it proves something. It doesn’t. That’s just desperate. Dude, please stop lying and misinterpreting, and stop hijacking someone else’s topic to create drama

It does prove 'something.'

You said, 'Who are those 2 dudes from 1700?' to say what is ethical and moral, where those 'two dudes' are those who define our understanding of ethics and morality.

You said how the opinion of courts doesn't matter, how the opinion of the majority doesn't matter... You were a hypocrite, excusing one party but accusing the other...

You said how it is OK to wipe out the town of 5,000~10,000 for one, which is what Nazis did, only that they were wiping out 'only' 100 for one…

Yeah, that very much does prove something—about the worth of your opinion.

https://steamcommunity.com/app/319630/discussions/

[Bilge]

This is actually hilarious, lol. What’s happening is, your first quote isn’t even mine. You literally edited the quote codes to make it look like I said something I never did. Then when I point out the obvious, you start copy-pasting totally unrelated replies I made in a different topic to prove something I still never said. And you’re doing this in some other guy’s unrelated thread, after the original conversation ended a week ago

Also, I never said “Who are those 2 dudes from 1700” or that the court decision doesn’t matter. Every single reply of yours is drowning in lies

You see me in a completely different topic and out of nowhere, you start bringing up my replies from an old, finished argument just to stir up drama. Go see a shrink and get lost, you’re pathetic

[Qiana]

Originally posted by Bilge:

This is actually hilarious, lol. What’s happening is, your first quote isn’t even mine. You literally edited the quote codes to make it look like I said something I never did. Then when I point out the obvious, you start copy-pasting totally unrelated replies I made in a different topic to prove something I still never said.

Your illiteracy is by far the most hilarious here. First you complained about added text because [you didn't know how the text in square brackets] is the official way to add something inside the quoted text, and then you don't recognize the second common thing in journalism—using two different fonts in a "question-answer."

The copy-and-pasted link pretty much proves that you did say it. You desperately tried to excuse the inexcusable, and you denied that Chloe was playing with the gun she stole and that she was pointing it at Max's head like it was a toy. Can't you read?

Originally posted by Bilge:

And you’re doing this in some other guy’s unrelated thread, after the original conversation ended a week ago

Exceptional nonsense gets quoted over many years here, not only after a couple of days.

Originally posted by Bilge:

Also, I never said “Who are those 2 dudes from 1700” or that the court decision doesn’t matter. Every single reply of yours is drowning in lies

True—you repeated it two times—for each of them [Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832) und Immanuel Kant (1724-1804)] separately, which makes two in total.

https://steamcommunity.com/app/319630/discussions/0/591770487774801323/?ctp=11#c591772149599020430

Originally posted by Bilge:

You see me in a completely different topic and out of nowhere, you start bringing up my replies from an old, finished argument just to stir up drama.

I still see the same wrong answers by the same person with very questionable views...

Originally posted by Suffocation:

Originally posted by Bilge:

Go see a shrink and get lost, you’re pathetic

@Bilge with all due respect after reading your comments you are either a teenager or a very immature person, and if you’re not the first one you really could use some therapy, because I would HATE to see you have rewind powers and live in the same town as you...

[76561199345464909]

Originally posted by Bilge:

This is actually hilarious, lol. What’s happening is, your first quote isn’t even mine. You literally edited the quote codes to make it look like I said something I never did. Then when I point out the obvious, you start copy-pasting totally unrelated replies I made in a different topic to prove something I still never said.

I can also confirm that you actually did say all that, if that helps you somehow...

"You said, 'Who are those 2 dudes from 1700?' to say what is ethical and moral, where those 'two dudes' are those who define our understanding of ethics and morality."

"You said how the opinion of courts doesn't matter, how the opinion of the majority doesn't matter... You were a hypocrite, excusing one party but accusing the other..."

"You said how it is OK to wipe out the town of 5,000~10,000 for one [...]"

"You desperately tried to excuse the inexcusable, and you denied that Chloe was playing with the gun she stole and that she was pointing it at Max's head like it was a toy."

And... I can also add, whenever confronted with what you said, you replied with "You're lying," even though it was you who was in denial or lying...

Originally posted by Bilge:

Go see a shrink and get lost, you’re pathetic

Didn't almost everybody recommend that to you? Before it gets too late…

[Bilge]

How can you shamelessly tell this many lies so openly? I never posted any link or image, yet in your quote it shows as if I did. Do you know why it looks like that? Because you’re a liar. And now you’re making up nonsense about journalism too

The link you copy-pasted only exposes your own lie, because none of those messages have me sending any links.

About those two philosophers, I never said I didn’t know them. What I said was that I don’t care what they think. That doesn’t mean I don’t know who they are. But since you’re a liar, as usual, you twist my words and act like I said I didn’t know them

And now, you two are digging up a dead argument days later in a completely unrelated topic just to start drama again (like how you previously called me stupid behind my back for no reason) and then you have the nerve to tell me I’m the one who needs to see a psychologist. Are you people brainless? I’m not the one who’s restarting a long dead conversation out of nowhere

[Bilge]

I apologize to the person who opened this topic on behalf of these two insolent people for trying to start an argument out of nowhere in an unrelated discussion

[76561199345464909]

Originally posted by Bilge:

How can you shamelessly tell this many lies so openly? I never posted any link or image, yet in your quote it shows as if I did. Do you know why it looks like that? Because you’re a liar.

Images only showed what you have said. The post is still there...

Originally posted by Bilge:

And now you’re making up nonsense about journalism too

No, that's a fact. That you don't know about it is another thing. You never even heard of Bentham and Kant before—why should you know anything about proper writing?

Originally posted by Bilge:

The link you copy-pasted only exposes your own lie, because none of those messages have me sending any links.

Nope. It only exposes your reading and writing skills. The post is still there...

Originally posted by Bilge:

About those two philosophers, I never said I didn’t know them. What I said was that I don’t care what they think.

So, you are then just totally ignorant, then?

Originally posted by Bilge:

And now, you two are digging up a dead argument days later in a completely unrelated topic just to start drama again (like how you previously called me stupid behind my back for no reason) and then you have the nerve to tell me I’m the one who needs to see a psychologist. Are you people brainless? I’m not the one who’s restarting a long dead conversation out of nowhere

You do need a therapist, and you were told why; someone will quote you in some other thread even years after. Some people are always worth quoting for some reason. That's how it works in real life and on Steam forums, which are part of it. On every forum, you are what you write...

[Mallet]

Originally posted by Qiana:

You said how it is OK to wipe out the town of 5,000~10,000 for one, which is what Nazis did, only that they were wiping out 'only' 100 for one…

Ah yes, the good old nazi argument.