Chloe theory [Spoiler]

[HAcoreRD]

Chloe is destined to die.

Sounds simple, yet crazy.

When we first met Chloe, Max was discovering her powers. The threat of a Tornado, the end of the world, or atleast Arcadia Bay.

In Episode 3, by changing time and saving William, Chloe survived. However, she became paralyzed, and was wasting a way. She was likely to die soon. The timeline then was close to now. You have the option to mercy kill her.

Whether or not Max created that timeline, it can be theorized that Chloe is destined to die on or by Friday, the day the Tornado from Max's vision will hit.

I should also note that in all 4 episodes, she has nearly died in some way. It's safe to say, that Chloe is on borrowed time.

Adding onto this, these ominous nature events happened since Max prevented her death. Snow in summer, Eclipse, Birds dying randomly, whales beaching and dying, Double Moon. I should note that at the party there was a double moon, but at the Junkyard if you look, there's one moon. Perhaps foreshadowing her death.

If this is correct, her death will probably stop this tornado in episode 5. I see the Tornado as the universe's (or Nature's) way of erasing her.

[R!OT Sm4ker]

Tornado vision was before toilet scene

[HAcoreRD]

R!OT Sm4ker님이 먼저 게시:

Tornado vision was before toilet scene

Thus if Max revives Chloe again, she will have to kill Chloe in the end. Chaos Theory.

[saint pasolini]

I am pretty heavily interested in this theory myself, I just don't understand why Max was given her powers at all. If she never discovered she could reverse time, Chloe would be dead in the girl's bathroom at Blackwell and all would be well in the universe, according to the theory.
So Max's power must exist because rather, Chloe needs to live. Although it's possible Max's abilities and the ecological phenomena are unconnected, it seems hella unlikely.

[HAcoreRD]

hella dead님이 먼저 게시:

I am pretty heavily interested in this theory myself, I just don't understand why Max was given her powers at all. If she never discovered she could reverse time, Chloe would be dead in the girl's bathroom at Blackwell and all would be well in the universe, according to the theory.
So Max's power must exist because rather, Chloe needs to live. Although it's possible Max's abilities and the ecological phenomena are unconnected, it seems hella unlikely.

It's possible that Chloe's death in Episode 1 was premature? Maybe there's something she needs to do. Find closure from Rachel's death? Discover happiness again in her friend Max? Save Max?

[R!OT Sm4ker]

HAcoreRD님이 먼저 게시:

Thus if Max revives Chloe again, she will have to kill Chloe in the end. Chaos Theory.

okay, William`s timeline, Chloe is safe and sound then car accident happens --> she didn`t die, so no, her death isn`t connected to the end of the world suppose.

[nblackburn]

I feel she was going to die regardless it be from her accident or some other means.

[HAcoreRD]

R!OT Sm4ker님이 먼저 게시:

HAcoreRD님이 먼저 게시:

Thus if Max revives Chloe again, she will have to kill Chloe in the end. Chaos Theory.

okay, William`s timeline, Chloe is safe and sound then car accident happens --> she didn`t die, so no, her death isn`t connected to the end of the world suppose.

Her death was in the past. Her in the bed in that time line's present would be the "Now". She either has you kill her, or she would die "soon" from her respiratory system dying. (Which is why she asked you to kill her)

[Vibe Check]

Maybe max is stuck in a loop because she realize at the end of ep5 that chloe must die but she refuse to let her die so she is able to rewind until the begining of ep1 but she don't remember

[saint pasolini]

Luigi00826님이 먼저 게시:

Maybe max is stuck in a loop because she realize at the end of ep5 that chloe must die but she refuse to let her die so she is able to rewind until the begining of ep1 but she don't remember

Ha, that reminds me of Madoka Magica. There is even an apocalyptic scenario in both series. And gay undertones.

[w20ster]

I was thinking of starting a topic on this earlier but this explanation is better lol. It certainly fits in with what's been happening to Chloe.

[R!OT Sm4ker]

HAcoreRD님이 먼저 게시:

Her death was in the past. Her in the bed in that time line's present would be the "Now". She either has you kill her, or she would die "soon" from her respiratory system dying. (Which is why she asked you to kill her)

U didn`t get it, Why "universe (or Nature)" didn`t kill her before, at original timeline she "was" dead already, why she is still alive in William`s timeline?

[432hz Shaman]

What i dont get is, why would jefferson not just kill both, no reason to keep her alive except for the fact shes a main character

[nblackburn]

xXx_Snowtrooper_xXx님이 먼저 게시:

What i dont get is, why would jefferson not just kill both, no reason to keep her alive except for the fact shes a main character

Because there is art to do.

[432hz Shaman]

nblackburn님이 먼저 게시:

xXx_Snowtrooper_xXx님이 먼저 게시:

What i dont get is, why would jefferson not just kill both, no reason to keep her alive except for the fact shes a main character

Because there is art to do.

that is true, never thought of that











"art"

[Vibe Check]

xXx_Snowtrooper_xXx님이 먼저 게시:

What i dont get is, why would jefferson not just kill both, no reason to keep her alive except for the fact shes a main character

because if he tried to drug chloe she would have shoot him